Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27879658›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2016

The Emergence of Pan-Cancer CIMP and Its Elusive Interpretation.

Brendan F Miller, Francisco Sánchez-Vega, Laura Elnitski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Targeted Assessment ofClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetics in ovarian cancer.Seminars in cancer biology · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. MicroRNA in Glioblastoma: An Overview.International journal of genomics · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brendan F MillerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. millerbf2@mail.nih.gov.
Francisco Sánchez-VegaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. sanchezf@cbio.mskcc.org.
Laura ElnitskiNational Human Genome Research Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. elnitski@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Regulatory and epigenetic landscapes reveal biological processes, disease mechanisms and diagnostic markersZIAHG200323 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ELNITSKI, LAURA L · 2009 to 2025
$27.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic dysregulation is recognized as a hallmark of cancer. In the last 16 years, a CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) has been documented in tumors originating from different tissues. However, a looming question in the field is whether or not CIMP is a pan-cancer phenomenon or a tissue-specific event. Here, we give a synopsis of the history of CIMP and describe the pattern of DNA methylation that defines the CIMP phenotype in different cancer types. We highlight new conceptual approaches of classifying tumors based on CIMP in a cancer type-agnostic way that reveal the presence of distinct CIMP tumors in a multitude of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets, suggesting that this phenotype may transcend tissue-type specificity. Lastly, we show evidence supporting the clinical relevance of CIMP-positive tumors and suggest that a common CIMP etiology may define new mechanistic targets in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationCpG IslandsDatasets as TopicEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeoplasmsOrgan SpecificityPhenotypeCpG island methylator phenotypeDNA methylationpan-cancer

Identifiers

PMID27879658
PMCPMC5197955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.