Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27878852›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2017

Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.

Jingxia Liu, Graham A Colditz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04366440 (De-Implementation of Unnecessary Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04366440 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

De-Implementation of Unnecessary Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2020 to 2024Enrolled18,267ConditionsSurgical Site InfectionArmsOrder set review and modification with facilitation, Order set review and modification
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Association between PMBMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingxia LiuDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis (WUSTL), St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Graham A ColditzDepartment of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis (WUSTL), St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA196510 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FIELDS, RYAN C · 2016 to 2020
$10.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are often applied in biomedical research and clinical trials to evaluate the treatment effect. The association pattern within the subject must be considered in both sample size calculation and the analysis. One of the most important approaches to analyze such a study is the generalized estimating equation (GEE) proposed by Liang and Zeger, in which "working correlation structure" is introduced and the association pattern within the subject depends on a vector of association parameters denoted by ρ. The explicit sample size formulas for two-group comparison in linear and logistic regression models are obtained based on the GEE method by Liu and Liang. For cluster randomized trials (CRTs), researchers proposed the optimal sample sizes at both the cluster and individual level as a function of sampling costs and the intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC). In these approaches, the optimal sample sizes depend strongly on the ICC. However, the ICC is usually unknown for CRTs and multicenter trials. To overcome this shortcoming, Van Breukelen et al. consider a range of possible ICC values identified from literature reviews and present Maximin designs (MMDs) based on relative efficiency (RE) and efficiency under budget and cost constraints. In this paper, the optimal sample size and number of repeated measurements using GEE models with an exchangeable working correlation matrix is proposed under the considerations of fixed budget, where "optimal" refers to maximum power for a given sampling budget. The equations of sample size and number of repeated measurements for a known parameter value ρ are derived and a straightforward algorithm for unknown ρ is developed. Applications in practice are discussed. We also discuss the existence of the optimal design when an AR(1) working correlation matrix is assumed. Our proposed method can be extended under the scenarios when the true and working correlation matrix are different.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAlgorithmsBiometryCluster AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLongitudinal StudiesResearch DesignSample SizeGeneralized estimating equationLongitudinal studiesOptimal designPowerWorking correlation matrix

Identifiers

PMID27878852
PMCPMC5575779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.