ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2017
Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with solid brain neoplasms: results of a survey among Italian physicians.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticoagulation in splanchnic and cerebral vein thrombosis: An international vignette-based survey.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020Article
- Inferior vena cava filter in patients with venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events: building the evidence.Internal and emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Inferior vena cava filters: use or abuse?Internal and emergency medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decision concerning the introduction of primary and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with solid brain neoplasms and brain metastases is often challenging due to the concomitant increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and to limited evidence from available literature. A standardized questionnaire composed of nine multiple-choice questions regarding primary VTE prevention in non-surgical patients during high-risk conditions and VTE secondary prevention in patients with a solid brain neoplasm or cerebral metastases was sent via electronic mail to all the members (n = 2420) of the Italian Federation of the Internal Medicine Hospital Executives' Associations (FADOI) in June 2015. Three hundred and fifty two physicians (14.5%) returned it (participants' median age 51 years; females 46.9%). The majority of respondents prescribe primary thromboprophylaxis (usually with heparin) in non-surgical patients with solid brain neoplasms and brain metastases in concomitance with high-risk conditions. Full-dose anticoagulation with either low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux is the preferred option for acute VTE (69.6%), while a reduced dose is chosen by 21.0% of physicians. The presence of a highly vascular brain neoplasm histotype mandates the prescription of a reduced-dose antithrombotic regimen in a minority of respondents. Vena cava filter placement is an option for the treatment of acute VTE in more than 6% of respondents. Anticoagulants are often prescribed for both VTE primary prevention and treatment. In conclusion, physicians' managements are partially in contrast to recent guidelines, reinforcing the need for educational programs and other studies in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.