Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27878549›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2017

Fluoroscopic freehand and electromagnetic-guided targeting system for distal locking screws of humeral intramedullary nail.

P Persiani, M Gurzi, O Moreschini, G Di Giacomo, C Villani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of fluoroscopic versus electromagnetic distal locking in humeral shaft osteosynthesis using intramedullary nail: a retrospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P PersianiDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Locomotive System, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro n ° 5, Rome, Italy. ppersiani@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5795-3337
M GurziDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Locomotive System, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro n ° 5, Rome, Italy.
O MoreschiniDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Locomotive System, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro n ° 5, Rome, Italy.
G Di GiacomoDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Locomotive System, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro n ° 5, Rome, Italy.
C VillaniDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Locomotive System, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro n ° 5, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current techniques used to lock distal screws for the nailing of long bone fractures expose the surgeons, radiologists and patients to a hearty dose of ionizing radiation. The Sureshot™ Distal Targeting System is a new technique that, with the same results, allows for shorter surgery times and, consequently, less exposure to radiation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was performed on 59 patients (34 males and 25 females) with a simple humerus fracture diagnosis, type 1.2.A according to the AO classification, who were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with ante-grade intramedullary nailing with distal locking screws inserted with a freehand technique. Group 2 was treated with the intramedullary nail using the Sureshot™ Distal Targeting System. Two intra-operative time parameters were evaluated in both groups: the time needed for the positioning of the distal locking screws and the time of exposure to ionizing radiations during this procedure.

resultsGroup 2 showed a lower average distal locking time compared to group 1 (645.48″ vs. 1023.57″) and also a lower average time of exposure to ionizing radiation than in group 1 (4.35″ vs. 28.96″).

conclusionThe Sureshot™ Distal Targeting System has proven to be equally effective when compared to the traditional techniques, with the added benefits of a significant reduction in both surgical time and risk factors related to the exposure to ionizing radiation for all the operating room staff and the patient.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, IntramedullarySurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleFluoroscopyHumansHumeral FracturesMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeElectromagnetic guidedHumeral traumaInterlocking screwIntramedullary nailRadiation exposureRadiation free

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.