Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27878537›Full record

ArticleAmbio2016

A synthesis of convergent reflections, tensions and silences in linking gender and global environmental change research.

Irene Iniesta-Arandia, Federica Ravera, Stephanie Buechler, Isabel Díaz-Reviriego, María E Fernández-Giménez, Maureen G Reed, Mary Thompson-Hall, Hailey Wilmer, Lemlem Aregu, Philippa Cohen and 6 more

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Irene Iniesta-ArandiaSocial-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Edificio de Biología, Calle Darwin nº 2, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Campus de Cantoblanco, C.P. 28049 Madrid, Spain. irene.iniesta@uam.es.
Federica RaveraICAAM - Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, LDSP - Landscape Dynamics and Social Process Research Group, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7002-554, Évora, Portugal.
Stephanie BuechlerSchool of Geography and Development and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, 803 East 1st Street, Tucson, Arizona, 85719, USA.
Isabel Díaz-ReviriegoInternet Interdisciplinary Institute, Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss 5 Open University of Catalonia, 080193, Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain.
María E Fernández-GiménezDepartment of Forest & Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, 1472 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1472, USA.
Maureen G ReedUniversity of Saskatchewan, 117 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C8, Canada.
Mary Thompson-HallInternational START Secretariat, 2000 Florida Avenue N.W., Suite 200, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.
Hailey WilmerDepartment of Forest & Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, 1472 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1472, USA.
Lemlem AreguWorldfish, West Gyogone, Bayint Naung Road, Insein Township, Yangon, 11181, Myanmar.
Philippa CohenWorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, 11960, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.
Houria DjoudiCIFOR, Centre for International Forestry Research, Situ Gede, Bogor Barat, Jawa Barat, 16115, Indonesia.
Sarah LawlessWorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, 11960, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.
Berta Martín-LópezFaculty of Sustainability, Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Leuphana University, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany.
Thomas SmuckerDepartment of Geography, Ohio University, Clippinger Labs 122, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.
Grace B VillamorCenter for Development Research (ZEF), Walter-Flex 3, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Elizabeth Edna WanguiDepartment of Geography, Ohio University, Clippinger Labs 122, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This synthesis article joins the authors of the special issue "Gender perspectives in resilience, vulnerability and adaptation to global environmental change" in a common reflective dialogue about the main contributions of their papers. In sum, here we reflect on links between gender and feminist approaches to research in adaptation and resilience in global environmental change (GEC). The main theoretical contributions of this special issue are threefold: emphasizing the relevance of power relations in feminist political ecology, bringing the livelihood and intersectionality approaches into GEC, and linking resilience theories and critical feminist research. Empirical insights on key debates in GEC studies are also highlighted from the nine cases analysed, from Europe, the Americas, Asia, Africa and the Pacific. Further, the special issue also contributes to broaden the gender approach in adaptation to GEC by incorporating research sites in the Global North alongside sites from the Global South. This paper examines and compares the main approaches adopted (e.g. qualitative or mixed methods) and the methodological challenges that derive from intersectional perspectives. Finally, key messages for policy agendas and further research are drawn from the common reflection.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalClimate ChangeFeminismGender IdentityResearchFemaleHumansMaleFeminist political ecologyGlobal environmental changeIntersectionalityReciprocityReflexivity

Identifiers

PMID27878537
PMCPMC5120029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.