Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27878504›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2017

Intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of blood flow measurements on the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Giovanni Di Leo, Ida Daniela D'Angelo, Marco Alì, Paola Maria Cannaò, Giovanni Mauri, Francesco Secchi, Francesco Sardanelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cardiac MRI: technical basis.La Radiologia medica · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni Di LeoRadiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Ida Daniela D'AngeloPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostic, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Marco AlìPhD Course in Integrative Biomedical Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy. marco.ali90@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8156-7743
Paola Maria CannaòRadiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Giovanni MauriRadiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Francesco SecchiRadiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Francesco SardanelliRadiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to estimate the intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of blood flow measurements in the ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and a semi-automated segmentation method. The ethics committee approved this retrospective study. A total of 50 consecutive patients (35 males and 15 females; mean age±standard deviation 27±13 years) affected by congenital heart disease were reviewed. They underwent CMR for flow analysis of the ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery (1.5 T, through-plane phase-contrast sequences). Two independent readers (R1, trained radiology resident; R2, lower-trained technician student) obtained segmented images twice (>10-day interval), using a semi-automated method of segmentation. Peak velocity, forward and backward flows were obtained. Bland-Altman analysis was used and reproducibility was reported as complement to 100% of the ratio between the coefficient of repeatability and the mean. R1 intra-reader reproducibility for the aorta was 99% (peak velocity), 95% (forward flow) and 49% (backward flow); for the pulmonary artery, 99%, 91% and 90%, respectively. R2 intra-reader reproducibility was 92%, 91% and 38%; 98%, 86% and 87%, respectively. Inter-reader reproducibility for the aorta was 91%, 85% and 20%; for the pulmonary artery 96%, 75%, and 82%, respectively. Our results showed a good to excellent reproducibility of blood flow measurements of CMR together with a semiautomated method of segmentation, for all variables except the backward flow of the ascending aorta, with a limited impact of operator's training.

Indexed as

AdultAortaAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyBlood Flow VelocityCardiac Imaging TechniquesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart Septal Defects, VentricularHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMaleObserver VariationPulmonary ArteryPulmonary ValveRegional Blood FlowBlood flowCardiac magnetic resonanceHeart valvePhase-contrast sequencesReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID27878504
OpenAlexW2553852862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.