Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27878124›Full record

ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2016

Ultra-Early versus Early Excision and Grafting for Thermal Burns up to 60% Total Body Surface Area; A Historical Cohort Study.

Abdolkhalegh Keshavarzi, Mehdi Ayaz, Maryam Dehghankhalili

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdolkhalegh KeshavarziBurn and Wound Healing Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehdi AyazBurn and Wound Healing Research Center, Department of Surgery, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam DehghankhaliliStudent Research Committee, Burn and Wound Healing Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the outcome of patients with up to 60% total body surface area (TBSA) thermal burns undergoing ultra-early and early excision and grafting.

methodsThis historical cohort study was performed in two referral burn centers of Shiraz during a 1-year period from 2015 to 2016. We included those patients with thermal burns up to 60% TBSA who underwent ultra-early (48-72 hours) and early (7-10 days) excision and grafting. We excluded those who were hemodynamically unstable and those with electrical burns. The outcome of patients was determined by graft success, operation duration, blood loss, hospital length of stay and mortality rate.

resultsWe included a total number of 107 patients with mean age of 32.1 ± 11.6 years. There were 65 (60.7%) men and 42 (39.3%) women among the patients. Both study groups were comparable regarding the baseline characteristics. Ultra-early excision and grafting was associated with more, higher graft success rate (

conclusionUltra-early excision and grafting in patients with thermal burns covering less than 60% TBSA was associated with higher graft success rate, shorter hospital length of stay, lower infection rate and lower mortality rate when compared to early surgery.

Indexed as

ExcisionGraftingOutcomeThermal burnsUltra-early

Identifiers

PMID27878124
PMCPMC5118571
OpenAlexW2531484453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.