Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27877500›Full record

ReviewScience and technology of advanced materials2012

Progress of key strategies in development of electrospun scaffolds: bone tissue.

Sumit Pramanik, Belinda Pingguan-Murphy, Noor Azuan Abu Osman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science and technology of advanced materials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Manipulation of a quasi-natural cell block for high-efficiency transplantation of adherent somatic cells.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sumit PramanikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Centre for Applied Biomechanics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Belinda Pingguan-MurphyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Centre for Applied Biomechanics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Noor Azuan Abu OsmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Centre for Applied Biomechanics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been unprecedented development in tissue engineering (TE) over the last few years owing to its potential applications, particularly in bone reconstruction or regeneration. In this article, we illustrate several advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to the design of electrospun TE scaffolds. We also review the major benefits of electrospun fibers for three-dimensional scaffolds in hard connective TE applications and identify the key strategies that can improve the mechanical properties of scaffolds for bone TE applications. A few interesting results of recent investigations have been explained for future trends in TE scaffold research.

Indexed as

electrospinninghard tissuenanofiberpolymerscaffoldingtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID27877500
PMCPMC5090556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.