Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27877015›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Rainbow glare after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a review of literature.

Majid Moshirfar, Jordan D Desautels, Tyler S Quist, David F Skanchy, Mark T Williams, Ryan T Wallace

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Analysis of corneal stromal roughness after iFS 150 kHz and LenSx femtosecond LASIK flap creation in porcine eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Majid MoshirfarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; HDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT.
Jordan D DesautelsTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Tyler S QuistUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
David F SkanchyMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Mark T WilliamsUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
Ryan T WallaceBrigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the current literature pertaining to rainbow glare (RG), including incidence rate, clinical presentation, etiology, prognosis, and management. RG is a rare optical complication of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis that results in patients seeing an array of spectral bands surrounding point sources of light under mesopic and scotopic conditions. The mechanism is thought to be a consequence of the formation of a transmissive diffraction grating on the posterior surface of the corneal flap created by the FS laser. RG has a good prognosis and is usually self-limiting. Persistent RG with concomitant residual refractive error may warrant lifting the flap and photoablating the posterior surface of the flap. Patients with persistent RG and no residual refractive error should be considered candidates for phototherapeutic keratectomy on the posterior flap surface.

Indexed as

femtosecondkeratomileusisLASIKphototherapeutic keratectomyrainbow glare

Identifiers

PMID27877015
PMCPMC5108617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.