Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27877014›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2016

Prognostic potential of an immune score based on the density of CD8

Jun Dong, Jiao Li, Shiming Liu, Xingyu Feng, Shi Chen, Zhiwei Zhou, Yingbo Chen, Xiaoshi Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Extensive exploration of T cell heterogeneity in cancers by single cell sequencing.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jun DongState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine; Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Oncology.
Jiao LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Shiming LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Guangzhou 510260, China.
Xingyu FengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine; Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Shi ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine; Department of Gastric & Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Zhiwei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine; Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yingbo ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine; Department of Gastric & Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Xiaoshi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine; Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is heterogeneity in the prognosis of gastric cancers staged according to the tumornodes- metastasis (TNM) system. This study evaluated the prognostic potential of an immune score system to supplement the TNM staging system.

methodsAn immunohistochemical analysis was conducted to assess the density of T cells, B cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in cancer tissues from 100 stage IIIA gastric cancer patients; the expression of the high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) was also evaluated in cancer cells. The relationship between the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and immunological parameters was analyzed.

resultsAn immune score system was compiled based on the prognostic role of the density of T cells, B cells, MDSCs, and the expression of HMGB1 in cancer tissues. The median 5-year survival of this group of patient was 32%. However, the 5-year survival rates of 80.0%, 51.7%, 0%, 5.8%, and 0% varied among the patients with an immune score of 4 to those with an immune score of 0 based on the immune score system, respectively. Similarly, differences in DFS rates were observed among the immune score subgroups.

conclusionsAn immune score system could effectively identify the prognostic heterogeneity within stage IIIA gastric cancer patients, implying that this immune score system may potentially supplement the TNM staging system, and help in identifying a more homogeneous group of patients who on the basis of prognosis can undergo adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

B cellCD33gastric cancerhigh-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1)Immune scoreSTAT1T cell

Identifiers

PMID27877014
PMCPMC5101229
OpenAlexW2310611616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.