Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876821›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Logic models to predict continuous outputs based on binary inputs with an application to personalized cancer therapy.

Theo A Knijnenburg, Gunnar W Klau, Francesco Iorio, Mathew J Garnett, Ultan McDermott, Ilya Shmulevich, Lodewyk F A Wessels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Theo A KnijnenburgInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, US.
Gunnar W KlauCentrum Wiskunde &Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Francesco IorioEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, UK.
Mathew J GarnettWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK.
Ultan McDermottWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK.
Ilya ShmulevichInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, US.
Lodewyk F A WesselsNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and The Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

Center for Systems Analysis of the Cancer RegulomeU24CA143835 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI SHMULEVICH, ILYA · 2009 to 2016
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mining large datasets using machine learning approaches often leads to models that are hard to interpret and not amenable to the generation of hypotheses that can be experimentally tested. We present 'Logic Optimization for Binary Input to Continuous Output' (LOBICO), a computational approach that infers small and easily interpretable logic models of binary input features that explain a continuous output variable. Applying LOBICO to a large cancer cell line panel, we find that logic combinations of multiple mutations are more predictive of drug response than single gene predictors. Importantly, we show that the use of the continuous information leads to robust and more accurate logic models. LOBICO implements the ability to uncover logic models around predefined operating points in terms of sensitivity and specificity. As such, it represents an important step towards practical application of interpretable logic models.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorData MiningHumansLogicModels, TheoreticalNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSensitivity and SpecificityAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27876821
PMCPMC5120272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.