Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876787›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Deep phenotyping unveils hidden traits and genetic relations in subtle mutants.

Adriana San-Miguel, Peri T Kurshan, Matthew M Crane, Yuehui Zhao, Patrick T McGrath, Kang Shen, Hang Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Interpretable Fine-Grained Phenotypes of Subcellular Dynamics via Unsupervised Deep Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated scoring of nematode nictation on a textured background.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. IdentifyingiScience · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adriana San-MiguelSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Peri T KurshanDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Matthew M CraneInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Yuehui ZhaoSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Patrick T McGrathSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Kang ShenDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Hang LuSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Quantitative microscopy-based rapid phenotyping and screeningR01GM088333 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LU, HANG · 2011 to 2018
$2.3M
Mechanistic understanding of age-dependent genetic architectureR01GM114170 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MCGRATH, PATRICK T · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
Elucidating Synaptic Regulators via High-Throughput Morphology CharacterizationR00AG046911 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI SAN MIGUEL, ADRIANA · 2016 to 2018
$984k
Evolving multigenic extensions to lifespanR21AG050304 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LU, HANG, MCGRATH, PATRICK T · 2015 to 2016
$391k
Elucidating Synaptic Regulators via High-Throughput Morphology CharacterizationK99AG046911 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAN MIGUEL, ADRIANA · 2014 to 2015
$180k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG046911NIA NIH HHS R00 AG046911NIA NIH HHS R21 AG050304NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088333NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114170NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering mechanistic insights from phenotypic information is critical for the understanding of biological processes. For model organisms, unlike in cell culture, this is currently bottlenecked by the non-quantitative nature and perceptive biases of human observations, and the limited number of reporters that can be simultaneously incorporated in live animals. An additional challenge is that isogenic populations exhibit significant phenotypic heterogeneity. These difficulties limit genetic approaches to many biological questions. To overcome these bottlenecks, we developed tools to extract complex phenotypic traits from images of fluorescently labelled subcellular landmarks, using C. elegans synapses as a test case. By population-wide comparisons, we identified subtle but relevant differences inaccessible to subjective conceptualization. Furthermore, the models generated testable hypotheses of how individual alleles relate to known mechanisms or belong to new pathways. We show that our model not only recapitulates current knowledge in synaptic patterning but also identifies novel alleles overlooked by traditional methods.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociCaenorhabditis elegans Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27876787
PMCPMC5122966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.