Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876637›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2017

Fourth ventricle injection of ghrelin decreases angiotensin II-induced fluid intake and neuronal activation in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus.

Kimberly S Plyler, Derek Daniels

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly S PlylerBehavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Derek DanielsBehavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. Electronic address: danielsd@buffalo.edu.
Buffalo State University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Role of angiotensin II receptor signaling pathways in body fluid homeostasisR01HL091911 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DANIELS, DEREK · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
GLP-1 Effects in Water and Salt IntakeR01DK107500 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DANIELS, DEREK · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091911NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK107500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ghrelin acts in the CNS to decrease fluid intake under a variety of dipsogenic and natriorexigenic conditions. Previous studies on this topic, however, focused on the forebrain as a site of action for this effect of ghrelin. Because the hindbrain contains neural substrates that are capable of mediating the well-established orexigenic effects of ghrelin, the current study tested the hypothesis that ghrelin applied to the hindbrain also would affect fluid intake. To this end, water and saline intakes were stimulated by central injection of angiotensin II (AngII) in rats that also received injections of ghrelin (0.5μg/μl) into either the lateral or fourth ventricle. Ghrelin injected into either ventricle reduced both water and 1.8% NaCl intake that was stimulated by AngII. The nature of the intake effect revealed some differences between the injection sites. For example, forebrain application of ghrelin reduced saline intake by a reduction in both the number of licking bursts and the size of each licking burst, but hindbrain application of ghrelin had a more selective effect on burst number. In an attempt to elucidate a brain structure in which hindbrain-administered ghrelin and forebrain-administered AngII interact to cause the ingestive response, we used Fos-immunohistochemistry in rats given the treatments used in the behavioral experiments. Although several brain areas were found to respond to either ghrelin or AngII, of the sites examined, only the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) emerged as a potential site of interaction. Specifically, AngII treatment caused expression of Fos in the PVN that was attenuated by concomitant treatment with ghrelin. These experiments provide the novel finding that the hindbrain contains elements that can respond to ghrelin and cause decreases in AngII-induced fluid intake, and that direct actions by ghrelin on forebrain structures is not necessary. Moreover, these studies suggest that the PVN is an important site of interaction between these two peptides.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IIAnimalsCatheters, IndwellingCentral Nervous System AgentsDrinkingDrinking BehaviorDrinking WaterFourth VentricleGhrelinInjections, IntraventricularMaleNeuronsParaventricular Hypothalamic NucleusProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRats, Sprague-DawleySodium ChlorideAngiotensin IICentral Nervous System AgentsDrinking WaterGhrelinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosSodium ChlorideAngiotensin IIGhrelinHindbrainParaventricular nucleusSaline intakeWater intake

Identifiers

PMID27876637
PMCPMC5438304
OpenAlexW2549166365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.