Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876165›Full record

ReviewClinical psychology review2018

Application of Research Domain Criteria to childhood and adolescent impulsive and addictive disorders: Implications for treatment.

Sarah W Yip, Marc N Potenza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychology review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Is Neural Processing of Negative Stimuli Altered in Addiction Independent of Drug Effects? Findings From Drug-Naïve Youth with Internet Gaming Disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah W YipDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Marc N PotenzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: marc.potenza@yale.edu.

Funding

TSF to enhance treatment of cocaine dependenceP50DA009241 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KOBER, HEDY · 1994 to 2018
$40.5M
Research Training Fellowship in Substance use and Addiction (RTFSA)T32DA007238 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BRIAN D. KILUK, ISMENE L. PETRAKIS · 1988 to 2026
$5.7M
Translational Research of Cocaine, Striatum, and ImpulsivitiesP20DA027844 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, JANE R · 2010 to 2013
$3.6M
Neural mechanisms of CBT in cocaine dependence (Gender Differences Supplement)R01DA035058 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, KATHLEEN M., POTENZA, MARC N · 2013 to 2016
$2.3M
Neural mechanisms of galantamine treatment for cocaine dependenceK01DA039299 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YIP, SARAH · 2016 to 2020
$905k
Functional networks related to cocaine dependence and its treatment and relapseR01DA039136 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POTENZA, MARC N · 2016 to 2018
$754k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039299NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA027844NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035058NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039136NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative provides a large-scale, dimensional framework for the integration of research findings across traditional diagnoses, with the long-term aim of improving existing psychiatric treatments. A neurodevelopmental perspective is essential to this endeavor. However, few papers synthesizing research findings across childhood and adolescent disorders exist. Here, we discuss how the RDoC framework may be applied to the study of childhood and adolescent impulsive and addictive disorders in order to improve neurodevelopmental understanding and to enhance treatment development. Given the large scope of RDoC, we focus on a single construct highly relevant to addictive and impulsive disorders - initial responsiveness to reward attainment. Findings from genetic, molecular, neuroimaging and other translational research methodologies are highlighted.

Indexed as

AdolescentBehavior, AddictiveChildHumansImpulsive BehaviorDevelopmentDopaminefMRIImpulsivityReward sensitivitySubstance use

Identifiers

PMID27876165
PMCPMC5423866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.