Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876072›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2016

High-specificity bioinformatics framework for epigenomic profiling of discordant twins reveals specific and shared markers for ACPA and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis.

David Gomez-Cabrero, Malin Almgren, Louise K Sjöholm, Aase H Hensvold, Mikael V Ringh, Rakel Tryggvadottir, Juha Kere, Annika Scheynius, Nathalie Acevedo, Lovisa Reinius and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Epigenomics · 2025
    Article
  3. DNA methylation patterns in CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis.Seminars in immunopathology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Epigenetics in the pathogenesis of RA.Seminars in immunopathology · 2017
    Review
  18. Comment on "Epigenetics in the pathogenesis of RA".Seminars in immunopathology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

David Gomez-CabreroCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Malin AlmgrenCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Louise K SjöholmCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aase H HensvoldCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mikael V RinghCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rakel TryggvadottirCenter for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Juha KereCenter for Biosciences, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annika ScheyniusDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nathalie AcevedoTranslational Immunology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lovisa ReiniusCenter for Biosciences, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Margaret A TaubCenter for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Carolina MontanoMedical Scientist Training Program, and Predoctoral Training Program in Human Genetics, McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Martin J AryeeDepartments of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Jason I FeinbergCenter for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew P FeinbergCenter for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jesper TegnérCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars KlareskogCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anca I CatrinaCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tomas J EkströmCenter for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Tomas.Ekstrom@ki.se.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEJohns Hopkins University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007309 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 1985 to 2019
$43.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwin studies are powerful models to elucidate epigenetic modifications resulting from gene-environment interactions. Yet, commonly a limited number of clinical twin samples are available, leading to an underpowered situation afflicted with false positives and hampered by low sensitivity. We investigated genome-wide DNA methylation data from two small sets of monozygotic twins representing different phases during the progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to find novel genes for further research.

methodsWe implemented a robust statistical methodology aimed at investigating a small number of samples to identify differential methylation utilizing the comprehensive CHARM platform with whole blood cell DNA from two sets of twin pairs discordant either for ACPA (antibodies to citrullinated protein antigens)-positive RA versus ACPA-negative healthy or for ACPA-positive healthy (a pre-RA stage) versus ACPA-negative healthy. To deconvolute cell type-dependent differential methylation, we assayed the methylation patterns of sorted cells and used computational algorithms to resolve the relative contributions of different cell types and used them as covariates.

resultsTo identify methylation biomarkers, five healthy twin pairs discordant for ACPAs were profiled, revealing a single differentially methylated region (DMR). Seven twin pairs discordant for ACPA-positive RA revealed six significant DMRs. After deconvolution of cell type proportions, profiling of the healthy ACPA discordant twin-set revealed 17 genome-wide significant DMRs. When methylation profiles of ACPA-positive RA twin pairs were adjusted for cell type, the analysis disclosed one significant DMR, associated with the EXOSC1 gene. Additionally, the results from our methodology suggest a temporal connection of the protocadherine beta-14 gene to ACPA-positivity with clinical RA.

conclusionsOur biostatistical methodology, optimized for a low-sample twin design, revealed non-genetically linked genes associated with two distinct phases of RA. Functional evidence is still lacking but the results reinforce further study of epigenetic modifications influencing the progression of RA. Our study design and methodology may prove generally useful in twin studies.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesComputational BiologyDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsFemaleGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedTwins, MonozygoticAutoantibodiesGenetic MarkersACPABioinformaticsDNA methylationEpigeneticsRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID27876072
PMCPMC5120506
OpenAlexW2549229791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.