Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876030›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

Long-term outcomes following lower extremity press-fit bone-anchored prosthesis surgery: a 5-year longitudinal study protocol.

Ruud A Leijendekkers, J Bart Staal, Gerben van Hinte, Jan Paul Frölke, Hendrik van de Meent, Femke Atsma, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Thomas J Hoogeboom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruud A LeijendekkersDepartment of Orthopaedics, Physical Therapy, Radboud university medical centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Ruud.Leijendekkers@radboudumc.nl.
J Bart StaalRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerben van HinteDepartment of Orthopaedics, Physical Therapy, Radboud university medical centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan Paul FrölkeDepartment of Surgery, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hendrik van de MeentDepartment of Rehabilitation, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Femke AtsmaRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maria W G Nijhuis-van der SandenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Physical Therapy, Radboud university medical centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thomas J HoogeboomRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with lower extremity amputation frequently suffer from socket-related problems. This seriously limits prosthesis use, level of activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). An additional problem in patients with lower extremity amputation are asymmetries in gait kinematics possibly accounting for back pain. Bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) are a possible solution for socket-related problems. Knowledge concerning the level of function, activity and HRQoL after surgery is limited. The aims of this ongoing study are to: a) describe changes in the level of function, activity, HRQoL and satisfaction over time compared to baseline before surgery; b) examine potential predictors for changes in kinematics, prosthetic use, walking ability, HRQoL, prosthesis comfort over time and level of stump pain at follow-up; c) examine potential mechanisms for change of back pain over time by identifying determinants, moderators and mediators. METHODS/

designA prospective 5-year longitudinal study with multiple follow-ups. All adults, between May 2014 and May 2018, with lower extremity amputation receiving a press-fit BAP are enrolled consecutively. Patients with socket-related problems and trauma, tumour resection or stable vascular disease as cause of primary amputation will be included. Exclusion criteria are severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders. Follow-ups are planned at six-months, one-, two- and five-years after BAP surgery. The main study outcomes follow, in part, the ICF classification: a) level of function defined as kinematics in coronal plane, hip abductor strength, prosthetic use, back pain and stump pain; b) level of activity defined as mobility level and walking ability; c) HRQoL; d) satisfaction defined as prosthesis comfort and global perceived effect. Changes over time for the continuous outcomes and the dichotomized outcome (back pain) will be analysed using generalised estimating equations (GEE). Multivariate GEE will be used to identify potential predictors for change of coronal plane kinematics, prosthetic use, walking ability, HRQoL, prosthesis comfort and for the level of post-operative stump pain. Finally, potential mechanisms for change in back pain frequency will be explored using coronal plane kinematics as a potential determinant, stump pain as moderator and hip abductor strength as mediator. DISCUSSION: This study may identify predictors for clinically relevant outcome measures.

trial registrationNTR5776 . Registered 11 March 2016, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsProsthesis DesignBiomechanical PhenomenaExerciseHumansLegLongitudinal StudiesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePainPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of LifeResearch DesignAmputeesArtificial limbsFunctional outcomesOsseointegration

Identifiers

PMID27876030
PMCPMC5120460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.