Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876025›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Substituting sugar confectionery with fruit and healthy snacks at checkout - a win-win strategy for consumers and food stores? a study on consumer attitudes and sales effects of a healthy supermarket intervention.

Lise L Winkler, Ulla Christensen, Charlotte Glümer, Paul Bloch, Bent E Mikkelsen, Brian Wansink, Ulla Toft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Co-creation of healthier food retail environments: A systematic review to explore the type of stakeholders and their motivations and stage of engagement.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Can Healthy Checkout Counters Improve Food Purchases? Two Real-Life Experiments in Dutch Supermarkets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lise L WinklerResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Centre for Health, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Ndr. Ringvej 57, Building 84/85, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. lise.lawaetz.winkler@regionh.dk.
Ulla ChristensenSection of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte GlümerResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Centre for Health, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Ndr. Ringvej 57, Building 84/85, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Paul BlochSteno Health Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 8, 2820, Gentofte, Denmark.
Bent E MikkelsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Frederikskaj 10, Building B, B2,, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Brian WansinkMarketing in the Department of Applied Economics, Management at Cornell University, 114 Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Ulla ToftResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Centre for Health, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Ndr. Ringvej 57, Building 84/85, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKCapital Region of Denmark · DKCornell University · USGlostrup Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKSteno Diabetes Center · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe widespread use of in-store marketing strategies to induce unhealthy impulsive purchases has implications for shopping experience, food choice and possibly adverse health outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine consumer attitudes and evaluate sales effects of a healthy checkout supermarket intervention. The study was part of Project Sundhed & Lokalsamfund (Project SoL); a Danish participatory community-based health promotion intervention.

methodsConsumer attitudes towards unhealthy snack exposure in supermarkets were examined in a qualitative pre-intervention study (29 short in-store interviews, 11 semi-structured interviews and three focus group interviews). Findings were presented to food retailers and informed the decision to test a healthy checkout intervention. Sugar confectionery at one checkout counter was substituted with fruit and healthy snacking items in four stores for 4 weeks. The intervention was evaluated by 48 short exit interviews on consumer perceptions of the intervention and by linear mixed model analyses of supermarket sales data from the intervention area and a matched control area.

resultsThe qualitative pre-intervention study identified consumer concern and annoyance with placement and promotion of unhealthy snacks in local stores. Store managers were willing to respond to local consumer concern and a healthy checkout intervention was therefore implemented. Exit interviews found positive attitudes towards the intervention, while intervention awareness was modest. Most participants believed that the intervention could help other consumers make healthier choices, while fewer expected to be influenced by the intervention themselves. Statistical analyses suggested an intervention effect on sales of carrot snack packs when compared with sales before the intervention in Bornholm control stores (P < 0.05). No significant intervention effect on sales of other intervention items or sugar confectionery was found.

conclusionsThe present study finds that the healthy checkout intervention was positively evaluated by consumers and provided a 'responsible' branding opportunity for supermarkets, thus representing a win-win strategy for store managers and consumers in the short term. However, the intervention was too modest to draw conclusions on long-term sales and health implications of this initiative. More research is needed to assess whether retailer-researcher collaborations on health promotion can be a winning strategy for public health.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConsumer Health InformationDietary SucroseFood PreferencesAdultChildDenmarkFemaleFocus GroupsFood SupplyHumansInterviews as TopicMalePediatric ObesityQualitative ResearchDietary SucroseCheckout aisleConsumer researchEnvironmental interventionField studyFood environmentFood storesIn-store marketingNutritionParticipatory approach

Identifiers

PMID27876025
PMCPMC5120526
OpenAlexW2555427788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.