Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27876013›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Reduced neonatal mortality in a regional hospital in Mozambique linked to a Quality Improvement intervention.

Maria Elena Cavicchiolo, Paolo Lanzoni, Mazungo Olivier Wingi, Damiano Pizzol, Marco Daverio, Liviana Da Dalt, Giovanni Putoto, Daniele Trevisanuto

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Oxygen management among infants in neonatal units in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Elena CavicchioloDoctors with Africa CUAMM, Padova, Italy. mecavicchiolo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9965-6549
Paolo LanzoniDoctors with Africa CUAMM, Padova, Italy.
Mazungo Olivier WingiCentral Hospital of Beira, Beira, Mozambique.
Damiano PizzolDoctors with Africa CUAMM, Padova, Italy.
Marco DaverioDepartment of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Liviana Da DaltDepartment of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Giovanni PutotoDoctors with Africa CUAMM, Padova, Italy.
Daniele TrevisanutoDepartment of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, Padova, 35128, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal mortality remains a serious health issue especially in low resource countries, where 99% of neonatal deaths occur. Doctors with Africa CUAMM is an Italian non-governmental organization in the field of healthcare that has been working in Africa since 1955. In Mozambique, at the Central Beira Hospital (CBH), it has a project with the aim of supporting the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the Obstetrical Department of the CBH through a multi-level intervention. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of CUAMM continuous Quality Improvement intervention in terms of reduction of the overall neonatal mortality rate in the NICU of CBH.

methodsA baseline analysis was performed in order to assess the actual standard of neonatal care. Subsequently, the intervention was focused on three main areas: infrastructure, equipment and clinical protocols improvement. A retrospective pre- (2013)/post- (2014) implementation analysis of clinical outcomes was performed.

resultsTotal population included 4,276 newborns, 2,118 (50%) born in 2013 and 2158 (50%) born after implementation. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar apart from a higher incidence of outborn neonates (33% vs 30%, p = 0.02) and a lower incidence of Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (37% vs 43%, p < 0.01). The rates of admissions for asphyxia (22% vs 30%), sepsis (4% vs 7%) and prematurity (18% vs 28%) increased between the two study period. Mortality rate for each of these causes decreased from before to after the implementation: asphyxia (34% vs 19%, p < 0.01), sepsis (39% vs 28%, p = 0.06) and prematurity (43% vs 33%, p < 0.01).

conclusionWe found a reduction in mortality rate among newborns admitted to CBH's NICU after the first year of CUAMM intervention. Most of this reduction can be attributed to the decrease in deaths for asphyxia, sepsis and prematurity. A Quality Improvement intervention based on infrastructural, equipment and clinical objectives was associated with a reduction of neonatal mortality rate in a low-resource NICU.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationQuality ImprovementApgar ScoreFemaleHospitalizationHospitalsHumansIncidenceInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMozambiqueObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyLow resource settingNeonatal mortalityNGOQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID27876013
PMCPMC5120470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.