ReviewThe Clinical neuropsychologist2017
Early numeracy skills in preschool-aged children: a review of neurocognitive findings and implications for assessment and intervention.
Review in The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Content validity of measures in early numeracy in children up to eight years: A COSMIN systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Digital Compensation? Investigating the Moderating Role of the Home Learning Environment in the Effectiveness of Learning Apps.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Longitudinal behavioral and ERP evidence for domain-general working memory deficits in children with mathematical difficulties.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating Early Precursors of Academic Skills: Preliminary Validation of a Touchscreen-Based Digital Assessment in Preschoolers.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the NIH Baby Toolbox® Math measures.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- The power of supportive parenting on children's mathematical performance: evidence from a longitudinal study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development of food literacy in children and adolescents: implications for the design of strategies to promote healthier and more sustainable diets.Nutrition reviews · 2024Review
- The power of digital story in early mathematics education: Innovative approaches for children with intellectual disabilities.PloS one · 2024Article
- A scoping review of cognition in spina bifida and its consequences for activity and participation throughout life.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2022Article
- Numerical Training Videos and Early Numerical Achievement: A Study on 3-Year-Old Preschoolers.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Use of Local and Global Ordering Strategies in Number Line Estimation in Early Childhood.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Innate or Acquired? - Disentangling Number Sense and Early Number Competencies.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe goals are to (1) provide a review of the typical and atypical development of early numeracy; (2) present what is known about the neurocognitive underpinnings of early numeracy; and (3) discuss the implications for early assessment and intervention.
methodStudies on the development of typical and atypical early numeracy are reviewed with a particular focus on longitudinal findings including those from our work on spina bifida myelomeningocele. Implications of this research for assessment are presented. The paper ends with a discussion of early math interventions.
resultsLearning to count, identify numbers, and compare and manipulate quantities are key early numeracy skills. These are powerful predictors of school-age mathematical learning and performance. General neurocognitive abilities such as working memory and language, are also important for the development of early numeracy. It is recommended that early assessment for risk of mathematical learning difficulties include tests of both early number knowledge and key neurocognitive abilities. Math-specific interventions are most effective for improving early numeracy. There is currently little evidence that training of general cognitive functions transfers to mathematical learning.
conclusionUnderstanding the development of early numeracy skills and their neurocognitive predictors offer important insights into early assessment and intervention for children at risk for or with mathematical learning difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.