Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27875576›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Small RNA Library Preparation Method for Next-Generation Sequencing Using Chemical Modifications to Prevent Adapter Dimer Formation.

Sabrina Shore, Jordana M Henderson, Alexandre Lebedev, Michelle P Salcedo, Gerald Zon, Anton P McCaffrey, Natasha Paul, Richard I Hogrefe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. QMRInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Purification of mitochondria from skeletal muscle tissue for transcriptomic analyses reveals localization of nuclear-encoded noncoding RNAs.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabrina ShoreResearch and Development, Cell and Molecular Biology, TriLink BioTechnologies LLC., San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6848-1088
Jordana M HendersonResearch and Development, Cell and Molecular Biology, TriLink BioTechnologies LLC., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Alexandre LebedevResearch and Development, Cell and Molecular Biology, TriLink BioTechnologies LLC., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Michelle P SalcedoResearch and Development, Cell and Molecular Biology, TriLink BioTechnologies LLC., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Gerald ZonResearch and Development, Cell and Molecular Biology, TriLink BioTechnologies LLC., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Anton P McCaffreyResearch and Development, Cell and Molecular Biology, TriLink BioTechnologies LLC., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Natasha PaulEngineering and Instrumentation, Synthetic Genomics, Inc., La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Richard I HogrefeResearch and Development, Cell and Molecular Biology, TriLink BioTechnologies LLC., San Diego, California, United States of America.

Funding

Improved Library Preparation Workflows for Next Generation SequencingR43HG006820 · NHGRI · TRILINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI PAUL, NATASHA · 2013 to 2013
$133k
NHGRI NIH HHS R43 HG006820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For most sample types, the automation of RNA and DNA sample preparation workflows enables high throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation. Greater adoption of small RNA (sRNA) sequencing has been hindered by high sample input requirements and inherent ligation side products formed during library preparation. These side products, known as adapter dimer, are very similar in size to the tagged library. Most sRNA library preparation strategies thus employ a gel purification step to isolate tagged library from adapter dimer contaminants. At very low sample inputs, adapter dimer side products dominate the reaction and limit the sensitivity of this technique. Here we address the need for improved specificity of sRNA library preparation workflows with a novel library preparation approach that uses modified adapters to suppress adapter dimer formation. This workflow allows for lower sample inputs and elimination of the gel purification step, which in turn allows for an automatable sRNA library preparation protocol.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Small UntranslatedAptamers, NucleotideRNA, Small Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID27875576
PMCPMC5119831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.