Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27875575›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Auditory Time-Frequency Masking for Spectrally and Temporally Maximally-Compact Stimuli.

Thibaud Necciari, Bernhard Laback, Sophie Savel, Sølvi Ystad, Peter Balazs, Sabine Meunier, Richard Kronland-Martinet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thibaud NecciariAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2574-0948
Bernhard LabackAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Sophie SavelLaboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique, CNRS UPR 7051, Equipe Sons, Aix-Marseille Université, Centrale Marseille, Marseille, France.
Sølvi YstadLaboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique, CNRS UPR 7051, Equipe Sons, Aix-Marseille Université, Centrale Marseille, Marseille, France.
Peter BalazsAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Sabine MeunierLaboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique, CNRS UPR 7051, Equipe Sons, Aix-Marseille Université, Centrale Marseille, Marseille, France.
Richard Kronland-MartinetLaboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique, CNRS UPR 7051, Equipe Sons, Aix-Marseille Université, Centrale Marseille, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many audio applications perform perception-based time-frequency (TF) analysis by decomposing sounds into a set of functions with good TF localization (i.e. with a small essential support in the TF domain) using TF transforms and applying psychoacoustic models of auditory masking to the transform coefficients. To accurately predict masking interactions between coefficients, the TF properties of the model should match those of the transform. This involves having masking data for stimuli with good TF localization. However, little is known about TF masking for mathematically well-localized signals. Most existing masking studies used stimuli that are broad in time and/or frequency and few studies involved TF conditions. Consequently, the present study had two goals. The first was to collect TF masking data for well-localized stimuli in humans. Masker and target were 10-ms Gaussian-shaped sinusoids with a bandwidth of approximately one critical band. The overall pattern of results is qualitatively similar to existing data for long maskers. To facilitate implementation in audio processing algorithms, a dataset provides the measured TF masking function. The second goal was to assess the potential effect of auditory efferents on TF masking using a modeling approach. The temporal window model of masking was used to predict present and existing data in two configurations: (1) with standard model parameters (i.e. without efferents), (2) with cochlear gain reduction to simulate the activation of efferents. The ability of the model to predict the present data was quite good with the standard configuration but highly degraded with gain reduction. Conversely, the ability of the model to predict existing data for long maskers was better with than without gain reduction. Overall, the model predictions suggest that TF masking can be affected by efferent (or other) effects that reduce cochlear gain. Such effects were avoided in the experiment of this study by using maximally-compact stimuli.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalFemaleHumansMalePitch PerceptionSound Localization

Identifiers

PMID27875575
PMCPMC5119819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.