Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27875562›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England.

Guy Ziv, Karen Mullin, Blandine Boeuf, William Fincham, Nigel Taylor, Giovanna Villalobos-Jiménez, Laura von Vittorelli, Christine Wolf, Oliver Fritsch, Michael Strauch and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Guy ZivUniversity of Leeds, School of Geography, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-0763
Karen MullinUniversity of Leeds, School of Geography, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Blandine BoeufUniversity of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
William FinchamUniversity of Leeds, School of Biology, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Nigel TaylorUniversity of Leeds, School of Biology, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Giovanna Villalobos-JiménezUniversity of Leeds, School of Biology, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Laura von VittorelliUFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Environmental and Planning Law, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Christine WolfUFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Economics, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Oliver FritschUniversity of Leeds, School of Geography, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Michael StrauchUFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Ralf SeppeltUFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Martin VolkUFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Michael BeckmannUFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining and improving water quality is key to the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems, which provide important benefits to society. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) defines water quality based on a set of biological, hydro-morphological and chemical targets, and aims to reach good quality conditions in all river bodies by the year 2027. While recently it has been argued that achieving these goals will deliver and enhance ecosystem services, in particular recreational services, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating so. Here we test the hypothesis that good water quality is associated with increased utilization of recreational services, combining four surveys covering walking, boating, fishing and swimming visits, together with water quality data for all water bodies in eight River Basin Districts (RBDs) in England. We compared the percentage of visits in areas of good water quality to a set of null models accounting for population density, income, age distribution, travel distance, public access, and substitutability. We expect such association to be positive, at least for fishing (which relies on fish stocks) and swimming (with direct contact to water). We also test if these services have stronger association with water quality relative to boating and walking alongside rivers, canals or lakeshores. In only two of eight RBDs (Northumbria and Anglian) were both criteria met (positive association, strongest for fishing and swimming) when comparing to at least one of the null models. This conclusion is robust to variations in dataset size. Our study suggests that achieving the WFD water quality goals may not enhance recreational ecosystem services, and calls for further empirical research on the connection between water quality and ecosystem services.

Indexed as

EcosystemModels, BiologicalParks, RecreationalRiversWater QualityEnglandHumans

Identifiers

PMID27875562
PMCPMC5119820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.