Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27874834›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2016

Recovery of erectile function comparing autologous nerve grafts, unseeded conduits, Schwann-cell-seeded guidance tubes and GDNF-overexpressing Schwann cell grafts.

Florian May, Alexander Buchner, Kaspar Matiasek, Boris Schlenker, Christian Stief, Norbert Weidner

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cell Heterogeneity and Variability in Peripheral Nerve after Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian MayDepartment of Urology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich 81377, Germany f.may@arcor.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4318-7261
Alexander BuchnerDepartment of Urology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich 81377, Germany.
Kaspar MatiasekSection of Clinical and Comparative Neuropathology, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich 80539, Germany.
Boris SchlenkerDepartment of Urology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich 81377, Germany.
Christian StiefDepartment of Urology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich 81377, Germany.
Norbert WeidnerSpinal Cord Injury Center, Ruprecht Karls University, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissection of the cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer eliminates spontaneous erections. Using the rat as an experimental model, we compared the regenerative capacity of autologous nerve grafts and Schwann-cell-seeded nerve guides. After bilateral excision of cavernous nerve segments, cavernous nerves were reconstructed using unseeded silicon tubes, nerve autografts and silicon tubes seeded with either Glial-cell-line-derived (GDNF)-overexpressing or green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing Schwann cells (SCs) (16 study nerves per group). Control groups underwent either a sham operation or bilateral excision of cavernous nerve segments without repair. After 12 weeks erectile function was assessed by neurostimulation and intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement. The reconstructed nerve segments were excised and histologically analyzed. We demonstrated an intact erectile response upon neurostimulation in 25% (4/16) of autologous nerve grafts, in 50% (8/16) of unseeded tubes, in 75% (12/16) of the Schwann-cell-GFP group and in 93.75% (15/16) of the GDNF group. ICP was significantly increased when comparing the Schwann-cell-GFP group with nerve autografts, unseeded conduits and negative controls (P<0.005). In conclusion, Schwann-cell-seeded scaffolds combined with neurotrophic factors are superior to unseeded tubes and autologous nerve grafts. They present a promising therapeutic approach for the repair of erectile nerve gaps.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutograftsElectric StimulationErectile DysfunctionGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorGuided Tissue RegenerationMaleNerve RegenerationNerve TissuePressureRats, Inbred F344Recovery of FunctionSchwann CellsTransplantation, AutologousGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorErectile dysfunctionGDNFNerve graftsSchwann cells

Identifiers

PMID27874834
PMCPMC5200895
OpenAlexW2549743095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.