ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2017
A warm welcome for alternative CO
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seven critical challenges in synthetic one-carbon assimilation and their potential solutions.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Widespread dissolved inorganic carbon-modifying toolkits in genomes of autotrophicApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024Review
- Environmental Galenics: large-scale fortification of extant microbiomes with engineered bioremediation agents.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Review
- Microorganisms harbor keys to a circular bioeconomy making them useful tools in fighting plastic pollution and rising COExtremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2022Article
- Recent trends of biotechnological production of polyhydroxyalkanoates from C1 carbon sources.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Physiological limitations and opportunities in microbial metabolic engineering.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022Review
- Integrating greenhouse gas capture and C1 biotechnology: a key challenge for circular economy.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
- 15 years of microbial biotechnology: the time has come to think big-and act soon.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
- Metabolic engineering strategies to enable microbial utilization of C1 feedstocks.Nature chemical biology · 2021Review
- In-Depth Computational Analysis of Natural and Artificial Carbon Fixation Pathways.Biodesign research · 2021Article
- Deciphering the functional role of hypothetical proteins fromMolecular biology research communications · 2020Article
- Formaldehyde formation in the glycine cleavage system and its use for an aldolase-based biosynthesis of 1,3-prodanediol.Journal of biological engineering · 2020Article
- Toward ideal carbon dioxide functionalization.Chemical science · 2019Review
- Synthetic Biology Applied to Carbon Conservative and Carbon Dioxide Recycling Pathways.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Something special about CO-dependent COThe FEBS journal · 2018Article
- Plant Molecular Farming - Integration and Exploitation of Side Streams to Achieve Sustainable Biomanufacturing.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- About how to capture and exploit the COMicrobial biotechnology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.