ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018
Myocardial perfusion and left ventricular quantitative parameters obtained using gated myocardial SPECT: Comparison of three software packages.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction and myocardial area at risk assessed by cadmium zinc telluride single photon emission computed tomography after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Long-Term Prognostic Value of Automated Measurements in Nuclear Cardiology: Comparisons with Expert Scoring.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Transient ischaemic dilation ratio thresholds in patients with zero coronary calcium score undergoing exercise or dipyridamole stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging using a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2023Article
- Automated Analysis vs. Expert Reading in Nuclear Cardiology: Correlations with the Angiographic Score.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Retrospective assessment of at-risk myocardium in reperfused acute myocardial infarction patients using contrast-enhanced balanced steady-state free-precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3T with SPECT validation.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021Article
- Impact of non-specific normal databases on perfusion quantification of low-dose myocardial SPECT studies.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- New techniques, distinctive population, unique normal databases.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Quantitative measurements of myocardial perfusion and function from SPECT (and PET) studies depend on the method used to perform those measurements.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare Emory Cardiac Toolbox, Myovation, and Quantitative Gated SPECT software regarding the automatic measurements of perfusion and functional left ventricular (LV) quantitative parameters, summed stress score (SSS), perfusion defect score, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume (ESV). METHODS AND
results
conclusionsDespite the significant concordance between software packages, considerable differences in mean values of myocardial perfusion and LV functional parameters were demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27873167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.