Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27873158›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2017

Feasibility and Importance of Enteroscopy after Gastric Bypass.

Dean Keren, H Madi, I Matter, A Assalia, T Rainis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Therapeutic effect of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dean KerenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Affiliated with Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Golomb 47, 31048, Haifa, Israel. dr.deankeren@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-0195
H MadiDepartment of General Surgery, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Affiliated with Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Golomb 47, 31048, Haifa, Israel.
I MatterDepartment of General Surgery, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Affiliated with Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Golomb 47, 31048, Haifa, Israel.
A AssaliaDivision of Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
T RainisDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Affiliated with Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Golomb 47, 31048, Haifa, Israel.
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery has increased in popularity, with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) being one of the most frequently performed. This leads to many cases in which the stomach is removed from routine gastroscopy access, sometimes being a major source of concern. Performing enteroscopy in these patients is technically difficult. We present our experience with 24 cases in which the aim was to access the detached stomach.

methodsRetrospective analysis on RYGB enteroscopy procedures aimed to access the detached stomach. Data recorded: demographic parameters, indication, gas insufflation, time to bypass stomach, total procedure and recovery times, and endoscopic and pathological findings.

resultsThis study included 24 patients who underwent RYGB in the previous 3-36 months. Indications were chronic abdominal pain, refractory anemia, or unexplainable weight loss. Detached stomach was accessed in 79% of patients. Access time ranged from 25 to 55 min. Recovery time for all procedures was 86.66 min on average and shorter with CO

conclusionsWe present the feasibility and importance of enteroscopy of the detached stomach and believe that this procedure should be performed more frequently. A high index of suspicion is needed for postoperative symptoms in order to exclude significant pathologies and reassure symptomatic patients that there is no abnormality in the bypassed stomach.

Indexed as

AdultEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStomachBariatric surgeryGastric bypassRemnant stomachRetrograde enteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID27873158
OpenAlexW2552178809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.