Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27873135›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2017

Left atrium: the last bulwark before overt heart failure.

Matteo Cameli, Giulia Elena Mandoli, Sergio Mondillo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Left atrial myopathy predicts cardiovascular outcome in hypertension and diabetes.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Left atrial function.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matteo CameliDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", Viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Giulia Elena MandoliDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", Viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy. giulia_elena@hotmail.it.
Sergio MondilloDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", Viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has emerged as an important public health issue in recent years. It represents the most common type of HF in ambulatory setting, and it has been recognized as a different entity from the reduced ejection fraction (EF) form. In HFpEF, continuous growing attention has been focused on the role of the left atrium (LA) in preserving good ventricular function and asymptomatic condition of the patient since the very first stages of diastolic dysfunction (DD). Non-invasive and complete echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic phase cannot exempt from accurately analyzed LA size, mostly LA volume, and its function, in particular LA myocardial deformation by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). This review examines the expanding role of the LA in DD and HFpEF and the importance of its complete assessment in various settings, from diagnosis to correlation with major cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

Atrial FunctionDiastoleDisease ProgressionEchocardiographyHeart AtriaHeart FailureHumansOrgan SizeVentricular FunctionDiastolic dysfunctionEchocardiographyHeart failureLeft atriumStrain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.