Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27873065›Full record

ArticleOecologia2017

Decline in territory size and fecundity as a response to carrying capacity in an endangered songbird.

Stefanie A Hartmann, Steffen Oppel, Gernot Segelbacher, Mery E Juiña, H Martin Schaefer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefanie A HartmannWildlife Ecology and Management, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. stefanie.hartmann.wildlife@gmail.com.
Steffen OppelRSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK.
Gernot SegelbacherWildlife Ecology and Management, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Mery E JuiñaYanayacu Biological Station, Cosanga, Ecuador.
H Martin SchaeferFundación Jocotoco, Lizardo García E9-104 y Andrés Xaura, Quito, Ecuador.
University of Freiburg · DEConocoPhillips (United States) · USRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Density-dependent processes are fundamental mechanisms for the regulation of populations. Ecological theories differ in their predictions on whether increasing population density leads to individual adjustments of survival and reproductive output or to dominance and monopolization of resources. Here, we use a natural experiment to examine which factors limit population growth in the only remaining population of the endangered pale-headed brush finch (Atlapetes pallidiceps). For three distinct phases (a phase of population suppression, 2001-2002; expansion due to conservation management, 2003-2008; and equilibrium phase, 2009-2014), we estimated demographic parameters with an integrated population model using population size, the proportion of successfully breeding pairs and their productivity, territory size, and mark-recapture data of adult birds. A low proportion of successful breeders due to brood parasitism (0.42, 95% credible interval 0.26-0.59) limited population growth before 2003; subsequent culling of the brood parasite resulted in a two-fold increase of the proportion of successful breeders during the 'expansion phase'. When the population approached the carrying capacity of its habitat, territory size declined by more than 50% and fecundity declined from 1.9 (1.54-2.27) to 1.3 (1.12-1.53) chicks per breeding pair, but the proportion of successful breeders remained constant (expansion phase: 0.85; 0.76-0.93; equilibrium phase: 0.86; 0.79-0.92). This study demonstrates that limiting resources can lead to individual adjustments instead of despotic behavior, and the individual reduction of reproductive output at high population densities is consistent with the slow life-history of many tropical species.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesSongbirdsAnimalsEcosystemFertilityPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsCarrying capacityCowbird parasitismDensity-dependenceIntegrated population modelPopulation regulation

Identifiers

PMID27873065
OpenAlexW2549578049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.