ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2017
[A new technique to facilitate donor preparation for DMEK surgery].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is becoming more and more the method of choice to treat corneal endothelial diseases in specialized centers. The reasons that prevent this technique from becoming widespread are the delicate donor tissue preparation. By inverting the curvature of the cornea from convex to concave after mounting onto an artificial anterior chamber, we developed a combined manual delamination and hydrodissection technique, which allows a rapid and endothelium-preserving method of separating donor Descemet membranes from the underlying stroma. MATERIAL AND
methodsExperiments were perfomed with 60 donor corneas that were not suitable for transplantation. Donor age ranged between 42 and 94 years. Two experimental groups were formed: 1 inverse manual delamination (n = 16) and 2 combined manual delamination and hydrodissection (n = 44). All experiments were undertaken by an experienced surgeon who was, however, not experienced with these techniques. We examined the frequency of Descemet membrane rupture as well as the amount of induced endothelial damage (trypan blue staining with quantitative image analysis).
resultsSignificant lesions of Descemet's membrane that would have led to a loss of the graft occurred in 25% of the manual delamination cases and in 4.5% using the combined technique. Endothelial damage induced by both techniques was low (6 and 5.2%, respectively).
conclusionFor DMEK donor preparation, a combination of manual delamination and hydrodissection was shown to be a safe and endothelium-protective technique to separate Descemet membranes from the underlying stroma. A very rapid learning curve for the combination technique is of specific additional interest for beginners in DMEK surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.