Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27873020›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2017

Beneficial and limiting factors for return to work following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.

Judith A M Groot, Freerk J Jonkers, Arthur J Kievit, P Paul F M Kuijer, Marco J M Hoozemans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Returning Athletes to Sports Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Suture tape augmentation ACL repair, stable knee, and favorable PROMs, but a re-rupture rate of 11% within 2 years.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith A M GrootCORAL-Center for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar, Orthopaedic Department, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Freerk J JonkersCORAL-Center for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar, Orthopaedic Department, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Arthur J KievitDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P Paul F M KuijerCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco J M HoozemansCORAL-Center for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar, Orthopaedic Department, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. m.j.m.hoozemans@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence-based advice for return to work (RTW) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is not available. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine when patients achieve full RTW, and to explore the beneficial and limiting factors for fully RTW after ACL reconstruction.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed after ACL reconstruction among 185 patients in one hospital. Data from patient files and a questionnaire were used to explore whether patient-, injury-, surgery-, sports-, work- and rehabilitation-related factors are beneficial or limiting for fully RTW after ACL reconstruction, using a backward stepwise logistic regression analysis.

resultsOf the 125 (68%) patients that returned the questionnaire, 36 were not part of the working population. Of the remaining 89 patients, 82 patients (92%) had returned fully to work at follow-up. The median time to fully RTW was 78 days. In the final regression model, which explained 29% of the variance, a significant OR of 5.4 (90% CI 2.2-13.1) for RTW > 78 days was observed for patients performing heavy knee-demanding work compared to patients performing light knee-demanding work. In addition, a significant and positive OR (1.6, 90% CI 1.2-1.9) for the number of weeks walking with the aid of crutches for RTW > 78 days was observed in the final model.

conclusionAfter ACL reconstruction, 92% of the patients fully return to work at a median time of 78 days. The significant predictors for fully RTW > 78 days are performing heavy knee-demanding work and a longer period of walking aided with crutches after ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

Return to WorkAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesACL reconstructionAnterior cruciate ligamentReturn to workWork load

Identifiers

PMID27873020
PMCPMC5250649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.