Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27872870›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2016

Nanoscale organization of synaptic adhesion proteins revealed by single-molecule localization microscopy.

Ingrid Chamma, Florian Levet, Jean-Baptiste Sibarita, Matthieu Sainlos, Olivier Thoumine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Activity-dependent diffusion trapping of AMPA receptors as a key step for expression of early LTP.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Decade of Super-Resolution Microscopy of the Presynapse.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid ChammaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR 5297, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France.
Florian LevetCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR 5297, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France.
Jean-Baptiste SibaritaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR 5297, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France.
Matthieu SainlosCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR 5297, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France.
Olivier ThoumineCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR 5297, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France; University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, 147 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux Cedex 33077, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Interdisciplinaire de Neuroscience · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of superresolution imaging has created a strong need for both optimized labeling strategies and analysis methods to probe the nanoscale organization of complex biological structures. We present a thorough description of the distribution of synaptic adhesion proteins at the nanoscopic scale, namely presynaptic neurexin-[Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]), and its two postsynaptic binding partners neuroligin-1 (Nlg1) and leucine-rich-repeat transmembrane protein 2 (LRRTM2). We monitored these proteins in the membrane of neurons by direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy, after live surface labeling with Alexa647-conjugated monomeric streptavidin. The small probe ([Formula: see text]) efficiently penetrates into crowded synaptic junctions and reduces the distance to target. We quantified the organization of the single-molecule localization data using a tesselation-based analysis technique. We show that Nlg1 exhibits a fairly disperse organization within dendritic spines, while LRRTM2 is organized in compact domains, and [Formula: see text] in presynaptic terminals displays a dual-organization pattern intermediate between that of Nlg1 and LRRTM2. These results suggest that part of [Formula: see text] interacts transsynaptically with Nlg1 and the other part with LRRTM2.

Indexed as

adhesion proteinsdirect stochastic optical reconstruction microscopySR-Tesselersuperresolutionsynapse

Identifiers

PMID27872870
PMCPMC5093229
OpenAlexW2547952283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.