Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27872588›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction.

Wendy Best, Jane Maxim, Claudia Heilemann, Firle Beckley, Fiona Johnson, Susan I Edwards, David Howard, Suzanne Beeke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Translanguaging in conversations for people with aphasia living in Greater Johannesburg, South Africa.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2025
    Article
  3. Conversation Analysis Based Simulation (CABS): A method for improving communication skills training for healthcare practitioners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy BestDepartment of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London London, UK.
Jane MaximDepartment of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London London, UK.
Claudia HeilemannDepartment of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London London, UK.
Firle BeckleyDepartment of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London London, UK.
Fiona JohnsonHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London, UK.
Susan I EdwardsDepartment of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College LondonLondon, UK; Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of ReadingReading, UK.
David HowardSpeech and Language Sciences, School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Suzanne BeekeDepartment of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London London, UK.
University College London · GBHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversation therapies employing video for feedback and to facilitate outcome measurement are increasingly used with people with post-stroke aphasia and their conversation partners; however the evidence base for change in everyday interaction remains limited. We investigated the effect of Better Conversations with Aphasia (BCA), an intervention that is freely available online at https://extend.ucl.ac.uk/. Eight people with chronic agrammatic aphasia, and their regular conversation partners participated in the tailored 8 week program involving significant video feedback. We explored changes in: (i) conversation facilitators (such as multi-modal turns by people with aphasia); and (ii) conversation barriers (such as use of test questions by conversation partners). The outcome of intervention was evaluated directly by measuring change in video-recorded everyday conversations. The study employed a pre-post design with multiple 5 minute samples of conversation before and after intervention, scored by trained raters blind to the point of data collection. Group level analysis showed no significant increase in conversation facilitators. There was, however, a significant reduction in the number of conversation barriers. The case series data revealed variability in conversation behaviors across occasions for the same dyad and between different dyads. Specifically, post-intervention there was a significant increase in facilitator behaviors for two dyads, a decrease for one and no significant change for five dyads. There was a significant decrease in barrier behaviors for five dyads and no significant change for three dyads. The reduction in barrier behaviors was considerable; on average change from over eight to fewer than three barrier behaviors in 5 minutes of conversation. The pre-post design has the limitation of no comparison group. However, change occurs in targeted conversational behaviors and in people with chronic aphasia and their partners. The findings suggest change can occur after eight therapy sessions and have implications for clinical practice. A reduction in barrier behaviors may be easier to obtain, although the controlled case series results demonstrate a significant increase in conversation facilitators is also possible. The rehabilitation tool is available online and video technology was central to delivering intervention and evaluating change.

Indexed as

agrammatic aphasiaaphasiaconversationinterventionoutcome measuretherapyvideo feedback

Identifiers

PMID27872588
PMCPMC5097900
OpenAlexW2547153985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.