ReviewAnatolian journal of cardiology2016
Evolving approaches to heart regeneration by therapeutic stimulation of resident cardiomyocyte cell cycle.
Review in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Potential Properties of Natural Compounds in Cardiac Stem Cell Activation: Their Role in Myocardial Regeneration.Nutrients · 2021Review
- miR-301a-PTEN-AKT Signaling Induces Cardiomyocyte Proliferation and Promotes Cardiac Repair Post-MI.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- Development of Small Molecule MEIS Inhibitors that modulate HSC activity.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Cardiac Actions of a Small Molecule Inhibitor Targeting GATA4-NKX2-5 Interaction.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart has long been considered a terminally differentiated organ. Recent studies, however, have suggested that there is a modest degree of cardiomyocyte (CM) turnover in adult mammalian heart, albeit not sufficient for replacement of lost CMs following cardiac injuries. Cardiac regeneration studies in various model organisms including zebrafish, newt, and more recently in neonatal mouse, have demonstrated that CM dedifferentiation and concomitant proliferation play important roles in replacement of lost CMs and restoration of cardiac contractility. Further studies with neonatal cardiac regeneration mouse model suggested that major source of new CMs is existing CMs, with the possibility of involvement of cardiac stem cells. Numerous studies have now been conducted on induction of cardiac regeneration and have identified various cardiogenic factors, cardiogenic micro ribonucleic acid and cardiogenic small molecules. This report is a review of studies regarding generation of CM and prospects for application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.