ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017
The neurobiology of uncertainty: implications for statistical learning.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- ALPARC: artificial languages with phonological and acoustic rhythmicity controls.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The neurobiology of human sequential signal prediction: Insights from language, music, and mathematics.Neuroscience research · 2026Review
- Speech Stream Composition Affects Statistical Learning: Behavioral and Neural Evidence.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- What's Surprising About Surprisal.Computational brain & behavior · 2025Article
- Statistical learning across cognitive and affective domains: a multidimensional review.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Review
- Temporal dynamics of uncertainty and prediction error in musical improvisation across different periods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Bodily maps of uncertainty and surprise in musical chord progression and the underlying emotional response.iScience · 2024Article
- Forward and backward blocking in statistical learning.PloS one · 2024Article
- Lexical Surprisal Shapes the Time Course of Syntactic Structure Building.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Seeking the neural representation of statistical properties in print during implicit processing of visual words.NPJ science of learning · 2023Article
- Delay and Acceleration Threshold of Movement Perception in Patients Suffering from Vertigo or Dizziness.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin to train emergency physicians to examine dizzy patients using the HINTS method.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Flexible structure learning under uncertainty.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Order of statistical learning depends on perceptive uncertainty.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Attention Shifts to More Complex Structures With Experience.Psychological science · 2022Article
- Brain-correlates of processing local dependencies within a statistical learning paradigm.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Unpredictability of the "when" influences prediction error processing of the "what" and "where".PloS one · 2022Article
- Synthetic Spatial Foraging With Active Inference in a Geocaching Task.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Rethinking statistical learning as a continuous dynamic stochastic process, from the motor systems perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Language statistical learning responds to reinforcement learning principles rooted in the striatum.PLoS biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The capacity for assessing the degree of uncertainty in the environment relies on estimating statistics of temporally unfolding inputs. This, in turn, allows calibration of predictive and bottom-up processing, and signalling changes in temporally unfolding environmental features. In the last decade, several studies have examined how the brain codes for and responds to input uncertainty. Initial neurobiological experiments implicated frontoparietal and hippocampal systems, based largely on paradigms that manipulated distributional features of visual stimuli. However, later work in the auditory domain pointed to different systems, whose activation profiles have interesting implications for computational and neurobiological models of statistical learning (SL). This review begins by briefly recapping the historical development of ideas pertaining to the sensitivity to uncertainty in temporally unfolding inputs. It then discusses several issues at the interface of studies of uncertainty and SL. Following, it presents several current treatments of the neurobiology of uncertainty and reviews recent findings that point to principles that serve as important constraints on future neurobiological theories of uncertainty, and relatedly, SL. This review suggests it may be useful to establish closer links between neurobiological research on uncertainty and SL, considering particularly mechanisms sensitive to local and global structure in inputs, the degree of input uncertainty, the complexity of the system generating the input, learning mechanisms that operate on different temporal scales and the use of learnt information for online prediction.This article is part of the themed issue 'New frontiers for statistical learning in the cognitive sciences'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.