Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27872366›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

The long road of statistical learning research: past, present and future.

Blair C Armstrong, Ram Frost, Morten H Christiansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hearing and Cognition in Childhood.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Examining three-way binding as a constraint on statistical learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Blair C ArmstrongDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada blair.armstrong@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-0389
Ram FrostBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain, and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.
Morten H ChristiansenHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Visual word identification: phonology &morphologyP01HD001994 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI MENCL, EINAR · 1985 to 2016
$23.5M
Neurocognitive determinants of adolescent second language literacy developmentR01HD067364 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI PUGH, KENNETH R. · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD001994NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

LearningBrainComputational BiologyHumansModels, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID27872366
PMCPMC5124073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.