ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016
Intensive care discharge summaries for general practice staff: a focus group study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [Prevention and treatment of long-term sequelae in critically ill patients-the responsibility of intensive care medicine].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions to promote family member involvement in adult critical care settings: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- A Co-Designed Post-ICU Follow-Up Pathway Is Feasible and May Be Associated With Improved Psychosocial Recovery for Patients and Their Caregivers: Outcomes From the IMPACT-ICU Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.Critical care explorations · 2026Trial
- General practitioners' views and experiences in caring for patients after sepsis: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- Do critical illness survivors with multimorbidity need a different model of care?Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Patients' experiences and perspectives of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A systematic review of qualitative research.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Review
- Patients' perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness: An interview study.Nursing in critical care · 2023Article
- The impact of an intensive care unit admission on the health status of relatives of intensive care survivors: A prospective cohort study in primary care.The European journal of general practice · 2022Article
- Hospital Discharge Summaries Are Insufficient Following ICU Stays: A Qualitative Study.Critical care explorations · 2022Article
- Quality of ICU Discharge Summaries Produced by Pediatric Residents: The Memorial Health University Medical Center Experience.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Patient discharge from intensive care: an updated scoping review to identify tools and practices to inform high-quality care.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Article
- Article
- Transitions from short to long-term outcomes in pediatric critical care: considerations for clinical practice.Translational pediatrics · 2021Review
- Article
- Health problems among family caregivers of former intensive care unit (ICU) patients: an interview study.BJGP open · 2020Article
- Hospital physicians' views on discharge and readmission processes: a qualitative study from Norway.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Interventions to promote patients and families' involvement in adult intensive care settings: a protocol for a mixed-method systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- Information sharing between intensive care and primary care after an episode of critical illness; A mixed methods analysis.PloS one · 2019Observational
- Should ICU clinicians follow patients after ICU discharge? Yes.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
- Under-recording of hospital bleeding events in UK primary care: a linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics study.Clinical epidemiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding how patients and relatives can be supported after hospital discharge is a UK research priority. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge summaries are a simple way of providing GPs with the information they require to coordinate ongoing care, but little evidence is available to guide best practice.
aimThis study aimed at better understanding the information needs of GP staff (GPs and practice nurses) supporting former patients of ICUs and their families following discharge from hospital, and identifying the barriers/facilitators associated with ICU-primary care information transfer. DESIGN AND
settingThis was a qualitative exploratory study of practices and participants throughout the UK.
methodAudiotaped focus group discussions, complemented by small-group/individual interviews, were conducted with 15 former patients of ICUs, four relatives, and 20 GP staff between June and September 2015. Demographic data were captured by questionnaire and qualitative data were thematically analysed.
resultsFindings suggest variability in discharge information experiences and blurred lines of responsibility between hospital and GP staff, and patients/relatives. Continuity of care was affected by delayed or poor communication from the hospital; GPs' limited contact with patients from critical care; and a lack of knowledge of the effects of critical illness or resources available to ameliorate these difficulties. Time pressures and information technology were, respectively, the most commonly mentioned barrier and facilitator.
conclusionEffective rehabilitation after a critical illness requires a coordinated and comprehensive approach, incorporating the provision of well-completed, timely, and relevant ICU-primary care discharge information. Health professionals need an improved understanding of critical illness, and patients and families must be included in all aspects of the information-sharing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.