Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27872075›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Gepotidacin against Gram-Positive Organisms Using Data from Murine Infection Models.

Catharine C Bulik, Ólanrewaju O Okusanya, Elizabeth A Lakota, Alan Forrest, Sujata M Bhavnani, Jennifer L Hoover, David R Andes, Paul G Ambrose

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pharmacokinetics of Gepotidacin in Renal Impairment.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catharine C BulikInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA.
Ólanrewaju O OkusanyaInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA.
Elizabeth A LakotaInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA.
Alan ForrestInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA.
Sujata M BhavnaniInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA.
Jennifer L HooverGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
David R AndesUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Paul G AmbroseInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA PAmbrose@ICPD.com.
Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gepotidacin (formerly called GSK2140944) is a novel triazaacenaphthylene bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor with in vitro activity against conventional and biothreat pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae Using neutropenic murine thigh and lung infection models, the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) of gepotidacin against S. aureus and S. pneumoniae were characterized. Candidate models were fit to single-dose PK data from uninfected mice (for doses of 16 to 128 mg/kg of body weight given subcutaneously [s.c.]). Dose fractionation studies (1 isolate/organism; 2 to 512 mg/kg/day) and dose-ranging studies (5 isolates/organism; 2 to 2,048 mg/kg/day; MIC ranges of 0.5 to 2 mg/liter for S. aureus and 0.125 to 1 mg/liter for S. pneumoniae) were conducted. The presence of an in vivo postantibiotic effect (PAE) was also evaluated. Relationships between the change from baseline in log

Indexed as

AcenaphthenesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingMice, Inbred StrainsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPneumococcal InfectionsPneumonia, StaphylococcalStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeThighAcenaphthenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsgepotidacinHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RinggepotidacinStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID27872075
PMCPMC5278741
OpenAlexW2554935731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.