Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27872074›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Glycoside Hydrolases Degrade Polymicrobial Bacterial Biofilms in Wounds.

Derek Fleming, Laura Chahin, Kendra Rumbaugh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Structural characteristics, functions, and counteracting strategies of biofilms inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Derek FlemingDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0054-904X
Laura ChahinDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Kendra RumbaughDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA Kendra.rumbaugh@ttuhsc.edu.
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in polymicrobial wound infectionsR01GM116547 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI WHITELEY, MARVIN · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistent nature of chronic wounds leaves them highly susceptible to invasion by a variety of pathogens that have the ability to construct an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). This EPS makes the bacterial population, or biofilm, up to 1,000-fold more antibiotic tolerant than planktonic cells and makes wound healing extremely difficult. Thus, compounds which have the ability to degrade biofilms, but not host tissue components, are highly sought after for clinical applications. In this study, we examined the efficacy of two glycoside hydrolases, α-amylase and cellulase, which break down complex polysaccharides, to effectively disrupt Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa monoculture and coculture biofilms. We hypothesized that glycoside hydrolase therapy would significantly reduce EPS biomass and convert bacteria to their planktonic state, leaving them more susceptible to conventional antimicrobials. Treatment of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms, grown in vitro and in vivo, with solutions of α-amylase and cellulase resulted in significant reductions in biomass, dissolution of the biofilm, and an increase in the effectiveness of subsequent antibiotic treatments. These data suggest that glycoside hydrolase therapy represents a potential safe, effective, and new avenue of treatment for biofilm-related infections.

Indexed as

alpha-AmylasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCellulaseGlycoside HydrolasesPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusalpha-AmylasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCellulaseGlycoside Hydrolasesbiofilmschronic woundsdispersalglycoside hydrolasePseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID27872074
PMCPMC5278739
OpenAlexW2550697572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.