Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27872072›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Pharmacokinetics of Anidulafungin in Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients with Suspected or Proven Invasive Fungal Infections.

R J M Brüggemann, V Middel-Baars, D W de Lange, A Colbers, A R J Girbes, P Pickkers, E L Swart

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of anidulafungin in the treatment of intra-abdominal candidiasis: a pooled analysis of patient-level data from 5 prospective studies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R J M BrüggemannDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, and Center of Expertise in Mycology, Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands roger.bruggemann@radboudumc.nl.
V Middel-BaarsDepartment of Pharmacy, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D W de LangeDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A ColbersDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, and Center of Expertise in Mycology, Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A R J GirbesDepartment of Intensive Care, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
E L SwartDepartment of Pharmacy, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echinocandins, such as anidulafungin, are the first-line treatment for candidemia or invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients. There are conflicting data on the pharmacokinetic properties of anidulafungin in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Adult ICU patients (from 3 hospitals) receiving anidulafungin for suspected or proven fungal infections were included in the present study. Patients were considered evaluable if a pharmacokinetic curve for day 3 could be completed. Twenty-three of 36 patients (7 female and 16 male) were evaluable. The median (range) age and body weight were 66 (28 to 88) years and 76 (50 to 115) kg, respectively. Pharmacokinetic sampling on day 3 (n = 23) resulted in a median anidulafungin area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIntensive Care UnitsInvasive Fungal InfectionsMaleMiddle AgedAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsantifungal drugsechinocandinsintensive care unitinvasive fungal infectionspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID27872072
PMCPMC5278699
OpenAlexW2555057811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.