Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27871929›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of urology2017

Past, Present and Future of Chemodenervation with Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.

Pradeep Tyagi, Mahendra Kashyap, Naoki Yoshimura, Michael Chancellor, Christopher J Chermansky

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Overactive bladder-which treatment when?]Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pradeep TyagiDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: tyagip@upmc.edu.
Mahendra KashyapDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Naoki YoshimuraDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Michael ChancellorDepartment of Urology, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Christopher J ChermanskyDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · US

Funding

Urothelium in Detrusor OveractivityP01DK093424 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KANAI, ANTHONY JOHN · 2013 to 2017
$7.9M
PDE5 Inhibition of Afferents and Interstitial Cells in Overactive Mouse BladdersR01DK098361 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BIRDER, LORI A, KANAI, ANTHONY JOHN · 2014 to 2024
$5.7M
Roles of Nitric Oxide and Superoxide in CystitisR01DK071085 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KANAI, ANTHONY JOHN · 2005 to 2017
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK093424NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071085NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe systematically reviewed preclinical and clinical studies on bladder chemodenervation with onabotulinumtoxin A to highlight current limitations and future drug delivery approaches. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified peer reviewed basic and clinical research studies of onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of neurogenic bladder and refractory idiopathic overactive bladder published between March 2000 and March 2016. Paired investigators independently screened 125 English language articles to identify controlled studies on onabotulinumtoxin A administration in the MEDLINE® database and abstracts presented at annual American Urological Association meetings. The review yielded an evidence base of more than 50 articles relevant to the approach of injection-free onabotulinumtoxin A chemodenervation.

resultsThe efficacy and safety of intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of overactive bladder are sensitive to injection volume and depth, and this issue has motivated researchers to study injection-free modes of drug delivery into the bladder. Urothelial denudation with protamine sulfate or dimethyl sulfoxide, liposome encapsulated onabotulinumtoxin A and other physical approaches are being studied to increase toxin permeability and avoid intradetrusor injections. Liposome encapsulated onabotulinumtoxin A enhances toxin activity while reducing its toxin degradation. The safety and efficacy of liposome encapsulated onabotulinumtoxin A were tested in a multicenter, placebo controlled study. Although this treatment successfully reduced urinary frequency and urgency, it did not significantly reduce urgency urinary incontinence episodes.

conclusionsIntradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin A is a safe and effective treatment as reported in several large multicenter, randomized controlled trials. Injection of the toxin into the bladder wall impairs afferent and efferent nerves, but injection-free drug delivery approaches only impair the bladder afferent nerves. Further studies are needed to develop better drug delivery platforms that overcome the drawbacks of intradetrusor injection, increase patient acceptance and reduce treatment costs.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ADrug Delivery SystemsForecastingHumansInjectionsLiposomesNerve BlockUrinary Bladder, OveractiveBotulinum Toxins, Type ALiposomesonabotulinum toxin Abotulinum toxinshydrogelliposomesnerve blockpeptides

Identifiers

PMID27871929
PMCPMC5386789
OpenAlexW2551911895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.