Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27871729›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2016

An Integrative Tinnitus Model Based on Sensory Precision.

William Sedley, Karl J Friston, Phillip E Gander, Sukhbinder Kumar, Timothy D Griffiths

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Tinnitus: A Dimensionally Segregated, yet Perceptually Integrated Heterogeneous Disorder.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Auditory Network Discoherence in Chronic Tinnitus.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Tinnitus severity and hearing loss: mechanistic insights and future directions.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  11. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

William SedleyInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: william.sedley@newcastle.ac.uk.
Karl J FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
Phillip E GanderHuman Brain Research Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sukhbinder KumarWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
Timothy D GriffithsInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK; Human Brain Research Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
University College London · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Iowa · USWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J011207/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus is a common disorder that often complicates hearing loss. Its mechanisms are incompletely understood. Current theories proposing pathophysiology from the ear to the cortex cannot individually - or collectively - explain the range of experimental evidence available. We propose a new framework, based on predictive coding, in which spontaneous activity in the subcortical auditory pathway constitutes a 'tinnitus precursor' which is normally ignored as imprecise evidence against the prevailing percept of 'silence'. Extant models feature as contributory mechanisms acting to increase either the intensity of the precursor or its precision. If precision (i.e., postsynaptic gain) rises sufficiently then tinnitus is perceived. Perpetuation arises through focused attention, which further increases the precision of the precursor, and resetting of the default prediction to expect tinnitus.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionHumansTinnitusauditory cortexprecisionpredictive codingtinnitus

Identifiers

PMID27871729
PMCPMC5152595
OpenAlexW2551679188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.