Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27871302›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Inti Qurashi, Simon Chu, Nusrat Husain, Richard J Drake, Imran Chaudhry, J F W Deakin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02613494 (A Feasibility Study of Glycopyrrolate in Comparison to Hyoscine Hydrobromide and Placebo in the Treatment of Hypersalivation Induced by Clozapine), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02613494 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Feasibility Study of Glycopyrrolate in Comparison to Hyoscine Hydrobromide and Placebo in the Treatment of Hypersalivation Induced by Clozapine

TypeinterventionalSponsorMersey Care NHS TrustRan2016 to 2018Enrolled29ConditionsSialorrheaArmsHyoscine, Glycopyrrolate, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hypersalivation: update of the German S2k guideline (AWMF) in short form.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inti QurashiAshworth Research Centre, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Simon ChuAshworth Research Centre, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. simon.chu@merseycare.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8921-4942
Nusrat HusainInstitute of Mind, Brain and Behaviour, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Richard J DrakeInstitute of Mind, Brain and Behaviour, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Imran ChaudhryInstitute of Mind, Brain and Behaviour, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J F W DeakinInstitute of Mind, Brain and Behaviour, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0214-33069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClozapine is the only medication licensed for the treatment of resistant schizophrenia in the UK. Although efficacious, a common and unpopular side effect of clozapine treatment is clozapine-induced hypersalivation (CIH), which can contribute to non-adherence. The standard treatment for CIH in the UK is hyoscine hydrobromide but this may aggravate cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia while glycopyrrolate may be an effective alternative with a more tolerable side effect profile. There is currently no convincing evidence for hyoscine, or any other medication, as an effective treatment for CIH. METHODS/

designThis is a multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility study of glycopyrronium bromide (glycopyrrolate) and hyoscine hydrobromide (hyoscine) in patients with clozapine-induced hypersalivation. We aim to recruit 42 patients who have been prescribed clozapine and are experiencing hypersalivation, and randomise them to one of three study arms (either hyoscine, glycopyrrolate or placebo). The primary outcome measures will be the participant recruitment and attrition rates, and the secondary outcome will be the metrics of the daytime hypersalivation measure. After a 1-week washout period (discontinuing CIH medication, if any), there will be a 4-week treatment period where participants will be titrated up to the maximum tolerated dose of hyoscine, glycopyrrolate or placebo. Measurements of daytime salivation, nocturnal salivation, cognition and side effects will be taken during home visits in week 2 and week 5. Information on salivation and side effects will also be taken through telephone calls in week 3 and week 4. To gather information on the experience of study participants, exit interviews will also be requested with all participants who drop out of the study and a sample of participants who complete the study. DISCUSSION: There is currently no convincing evidence for hyoscine, or any other medication, as an effective treatment for CIH. There is promising evidence that glycopyrrolate may be more successful in the treatment of CIH causing fewer cognitive side effects. We propose to conduct a randomised placebo-controlled feasibility study of glycopyrrolate and hyoscine in the treatment of clozapine-induced hypersalivation to inform the design of a future efficacy trial.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02613494 , 23 November 2015.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsClinical ProtocolsClozapineDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleGlycopyrrolateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsResearch DesignSalivationAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineGlycopyrrolateMuscarinic AntagonistsScopolamineAdultClozapineFeasibilityGlycopyrrolateHyoscineRandomised trialSialorrhea

Identifiers

PMID27871302
PMCPMC5117505
OpenAlexW2550470154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.