Trial reportBMC cancer2016
Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Radiotherapy With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Bone Metastases - VERTICAL Study
SAINT: Single frActIoN eighT Gray Palliative Radiotherapy With Modulated Intensity for Pain Reduction: a Single Arm Cohort Analysis
PREST: Pain REduction With Bone Metastases STereotactic Radiotherapy: A Phase III Randomized Multicentric Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of the Role of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Net Pain Relief After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Useful Measure to Reflect Response Duration? A Further Analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019Trial
- Pain REduction with bone metastases STereotactic radiotherapy (PREST): A phase III randomized multicentric trial.Trials · 2019Trial
- Understanding the unmet needs of patients with brain metastases referred for stereotactic radiotherapy and their caregivers: A prospective cohort study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- An Update on the Management of Bone Metastases.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) study design in oncology: experience and methodological reflections.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- A Multimodal Clinical Approach for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Solid Tumors.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- The evolution and understanding of skeletal complication endpoints in clinical trials of tumors with metastasis to the bone.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2019Review
- Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT) For Bone Metastases: Patient Selection And Perspectives.Cancer management and research · 2019Review
- Palliative radiotherapy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Review
- Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2018Article
- Article
- Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data.Research integrity and peer review · 2018Article
- Single-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandard radiotherapy is the treatment of first choice in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases, but is only moderately effective. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used to treat spinal metastases, without randomized evidence of superiority over standard radiotherapy. The VERTICAL study aims to quantify the effect of stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with metastatic spinal disease. METHODS/
designThis study follows the 'cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial' design. The VERTICAL study is conducted within the PRESENT cohort. In PRESENT, all patients with bone metastases referred for radiation therapy are enrolled. For each patient, clinical and patient-reported outcomes are captured at baseline and at regular intervals during follow-up. In addition, patients give informed consent to be offered experimental interventions. Within PRESENT, 110 patients are identified as a sub cohort of eligible patients (i.e. patients with unirradiated painful, mechanically stable spinal metastases who are able to undergo stereotactic radiation therapy). After a protocol amendment, also patients with non-spinal bony metastases are eligible. From the sub cohort, a random selection of patients is offered stereotactic radiation therapy (n = 55), which patients may accept or refuse. Only patients accepting stereotactic radiation therapy sign informed consent for the VERTICAL trial. Non-selected patients (n = 55) receive standard radiotherapy, and are not aware of them serving as controls. Primary endpoint is pain response after three months. Data will be analyzed by intention to treat, complemented by instrumental variable analysis in case of substantial refusal of the stereotactic radiation therapy in the intervention arm. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to quantify the treatment response after (stereotactic) radiation therapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. This is the first randomized study in palliative care following the cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial design. This design addresses common difficulties associated with classic pragmatic randomized controlled trials, such as disappointment bias in patients allocated to the control arm, slow recruitment, and poor generalizability.
trial registrationThe Netherlands Trials Register number NL49316.041.14. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02364115 . Date of trial registration February 1, 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.