Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27871280›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2016

Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design.

Joanne M van der Velden, Helena M Verkooijen, Enrica Seravalli, Jochem Hes, A Sophie Gerlich, Nicolien Kasperts, Wietse S C Eppinga, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Marco van Vulpen

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02364115 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Radiotherapy With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Bone Metastases - VERTICAL Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2015 to 2019Enrolled110ConditionsSpinal Metastases, Bone MetastasesArmsStereotactic Body Radiotherapy
NCT03554135 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

SAINT: Single frActIoN eighT Gray Palliative Radiotherapy With Modulated Intensity for Pain Reduction: a Single Arm Cohort Analysis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2018 to 2019Enrolled50ConditionsBone Metastases, Radiotherapy, TechnologyArmsPersonalization of palliative radiotherapy
NCT03597984 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

PREST: Pain REduction With Bone Metastases STereotactic Radiotherapy: A Phase III Randomized Multicentric Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2019 to 2020Enrolled330ConditionsBone Metastases, Radiotherapy, TechnologyArmsSimultaneous Integrated Boost-SIB on macroscopic metastases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. An Update on the Management of Bone Metastases.Current oncology reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Palliative radiotherapy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanne M van der VeldenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. J.M.vanderVelden@umcutrecht.nl.
Helena M VerkooijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Enrica SeravalliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jochem HesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A Sophie GerlichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nicolien KaspertsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wietse S C EppingaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jorrit-Jan VerlaanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marco van VulpenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard radiotherapy is the treatment of first choice in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases, but is only moderately effective. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used to treat spinal metastases, without randomized evidence of superiority over standard radiotherapy. The VERTICAL study aims to quantify the effect of stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with metastatic spinal disease. METHODS/

designThis study follows the 'cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial' design. The VERTICAL study is conducted within the PRESENT cohort. In PRESENT, all patients with bone metastases referred for radiation therapy are enrolled. For each patient, clinical and patient-reported outcomes are captured at baseline and at regular intervals during follow-up. In addition, patients give informed consent to be offered experimental interventions. Within PRESENT, 110 patients are identified as a sub cohort of eligible patients (i.e. patients with unirradiated painful, mechanically stable spinal metastases who are able to undergo stereotactic radiation therapy). After a protocol amendment, also patients with non-spinal bony metastases are eligible. From the sub cohort, a random selection of patients is offered stereotactic radiation therapy (n = 55), which patients may accept or refuse. Only patients accepting stereotactic radiation therapy sign informed consent for the VERTICAL trial. Non-selected patients (n = 55) receive standard radiotherapy, and are not aware of them serving as controls. Primary endpoint is pain response after three months. Data will be analyzed by intention to treat, complemented by instrumental variable analysis in case of substantial refusal of the stereotactic radiation therapy in the intervention arm. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to quantify the treatment response after (stereotactic) radiation therapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. This is the first randomized study in palliative care following the cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial design. This design addresses common difficulties associated with classic pragmatic randomized controlled trials, such as disappointment bias in patients allocated to the control arm, slow recruitment, and poor generalizability.

trial registrationThe Netherlands Trials Register number NL49316.041.14. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02364115 . Date of trial registration February 1, 2015.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapyHumansResearch DesignSpinal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeBone metastasesCohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial designPainRandomized controlled trialSpinal metastasesStereotactic body radiotherapyVERTICAL trial

Identifiers

PMID27871280
PMCPMC5117527
OpenAlexW2549509746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.