Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27871262›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2016

Determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women in Valencia, Spain.

R Vila-Candel, P Navarro-Illana, E Navarro-Illana, E Castro-Sánchez, Kiri Duke, F J Soriano-Vidal, J Tuells, J Díez-Domingo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Different perspectives of immunizations during pregnancyTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Adherence and Concordance of Influenza and Pertussis Vaccination Coverage in Pregnant Women in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Vaccination of pregnant women in the Valencian Community during the 2014-15 influenza season: a multicentre study.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2018
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R Vila-CandelMidwifery at La Ribera Hospital Health Department, Carretera Corbera, km 1, 46600, Alzira, Valencia, Spain. rvila@hospital-ribera-.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3734-2480
P Navarro-IllanaFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Católica de Valencia" San Vicente Mártir", c/ Espartero, 7. 46007, Valencia, Spain.
E Navarro-IllanaFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Católica de Valencia" San Vicente Mártir", c/ Espartero, 7. 46007, Valencia, Spain.
E Castro-SánchezNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) In Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Kiri DukeFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Católica de Valencia" San Vicente Mártir", c/ Espartero, 7. 46007, Valencia, Spain.
F J Soriano-VidalFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Católica de Valencia" San Vicente Mártir", c/ Espartero, 7. 46007, Valencia, Spain.
J TuellsCátedra de Vacunología Balmis, University of Alicante, Carretera de San Vicente del Raspeig, s/n. 03690, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
J Díez-DomingoFaculty of Nursing, Universidad Católica de Valencia" San Vicente Mártir", c/ Espartero, 7. 46007, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most countries the coverage of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women is low. We investigated the acceptance, reasons for rejection and professional involvement related to vaccine information in pregnant women in Valencia, Spain.

methodsObservational retrospective study in 200 pregnant women, 100 vaccinated and 100 unvaccinated, were interviewed during the 2014/2015 vaccination campaign. Electronic medical records, immunization registry and telephone interviews were used to determine reasons for vaccination and immunization rejection.

results40.5% of pregnant women in the health department were vaccinated. The midwife was identified as source of information for 89% of women. The vaccine was rejected due to low perceptions of risk of influenza infection (23%), lack of information (19%), considering the vaccine as superfluous (16%), close proximity of delivery date (13%) and fear of side effects (12%).

conclusionPregnant women in Spain declined to be vaccinated due to under-estimation of the risk of contracting or being harmed by influenza, and lack of information. Interventions aiming to optimize vaccination coverage should include information addressing the safety and effectiveness of the current vaccine together with improved professional training and motivation.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansImmunizationInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnant PeopleRetrospective StudiesSeasonsSpainVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesAcceptanceInfluenza vaccine coverageInfluenza VaccinesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27871262
PMCPMC5117491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.