Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27871260›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight?

Rebecca A Krukowski, Delia S West, Marisha DiCarlo, Kartik Shankar, Mario A Cleves, Marie E Saylors, Aline Andres

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01131117 (Fetal Programming of Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01131117 completednot on this map

Fetal Programming of Obesity

TypeobservationalSponsorArkansas Children's Hospital Research InstituteRan2010 to 2024Enrolled320ConditionsHealthy, Pregnancy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A Postpartum Weight Loss-focused Stepped-care Intervention in a Military Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Postpartum weight change one year after delivery and associated factors among women in Puducherry, South India: Findings from the JANMAM cohort.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Urinary mycoestrogens and gestational weight gain in the UPSIDE pregnancy cohort.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Association between 1BMC nutrition · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca A KrukowskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66 N. Pauline St, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA. rkrukows@uthsc.edu.
Delia S WestDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Marisha DiCarloArkansas Department of Health, Office of Health Communications, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Kartik ShankarDepartment of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Mario A ClevesPediatrics Biostatistics, Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Marie E SaylorsPediatrics Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Aline AndresDepartment of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn accurate estimate of preconception weight is necessary for providing a gestational weight gain range based on the Institute of Medicine's guidelines; however, an accurate and proximal preconception weight is not available for most women. We examined the validity of first trimester weights for estimating preconception body mass index category.

methodsUnder identical measurement conditions, preconception weight and two first trimester weights (i.e., 4-10 and 12 weeks gestation) were obtained (n = 43).

resultsThe 4-10 week and the 12 week weight correctly classified 95 and 91% women, respectively. Mean weight changes were relatively small overall (M = 0.74 ± 1.99 kg at 4-10 weeks and M = 1.02 ± 2.46 at 12 weeks). There was a significant difference in mean weight gain by body mass index category at 4-10 weeks (-0.09 ± 1.86 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.61 + 1.76 kg for overweight/obese participants, p = 0.01), but not at 12 weeks (0.53 ± 2.29 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.54 ± 2.58 kg for overweight/obese participants).

conclusionsAssigning gestational weight gain guidelines based on an early first trimester weight resulted in 5-9% of women being misclassified depending on the gestational week the weight was obtained. Thus, most women are correctly classified based on a first trimester weight, particularly an early first trimester weight, although it is possible that modeling strategies could be developed to further improve estimates of preconception body mass index category.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov # NCT01131117 , registered May 25, 2010.

Indexed as

Body WeightWeight GainAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleGestational AgeHumansLongitudinal StudiesNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionOverweightPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Trimester, FirstPrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisObesityObstetricsPreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID27871260
PMCPMC5117552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.