Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27871235›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2016

Development of the interRAI home care frailty scale.

John N Morris, Elizabeth P Howard, Knight R Steel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04537039 (Prospective, Multicentric Study, Aiming to Assess the Relevance of a Frailty Screening by Home Care Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04537039 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Multicentric Study, Aiming to Assess the Relevance of a Frailty Screening by Home Care Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorElsanRan2020 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsFrailtyArmsFrailty screening for people over 65 living at home.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Understanding Frailty Screening: a Domain Mapping Exercise.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2021
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John N MorrisQuality of Care and Health-Care Standards Program, Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth P HowardNortheastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Boston, MA, USA. e.howard@neu.edu.
Knight R SteelHackensack University Medical Center (emeritus), Hackensack, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of frailty, a relative state of weakness reflecting multiple functional and health domains, continues to receive attention within the geriatrics field. It offers a summary of key personal characteristics, providing perspective on an individual's life course. There have been multiple attempts to measure frailty, some focusing on physiologic losses, others on specific diseases, disabilities or health deficits. Recently, multidimensional approaches to measuring frailty have included cognition, mood and social components. The purpose of this project was to develop and evaluate a Home Care Frailty Scale and provide a grounded basis for assessing a person's risk for decline that included functional and cognitive health, social deficits and troubling diagnostic and clinical conditions.

methodsA secondary analysis design was used to develop the Home Care Frailty Scale. The data set consisted of client level home care data from service agencies around the world. The baseline sample included 967,865 assessments while the 6-month follow-up sample of persons still being served by the home care agencies consisted of 464,788 assessments. A pool of 70 candidate independent variables were screened for possible inclusion and 16 problem outcomes referencing accumulating declines and clinical complications served as the dependent variables. Multiple regression techniques were used to analyze the data.

resultsThe resulting Home Care Frailty Scale consisted of a final set of 29 items. The items fall across 6 categories of function, movement, cognition and communication, social life, nutrition, and clinical symptoms. The prevalence of the items ranged from a high of 87% for persons requiring help with meal preparation to 3.7% for persons who have experienced a recent decline in the amount of food eaten.

conclusionsThe interRAI Home Care Frailty Scale is based on a strong conceptual foundation and in our analysis, performed as expected. Given the use of the interRAI Home Care Assessment System in multiple, diverse countries, the Home Care Frailty Scale will have wide applicability to support program planning and policy decision-making impacting home care clients and their formal and informal caregivers throughout the world.

Indexed as

AgingCognitionNutrition AssessmentSocial SkillsVisual Analog ScaleAffectAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHome Care ServicesHumansIndependent LivingMaleAssessmentFrailty scaleHome careInterRAI

Identifiers

PMID27871235
PMCPMC5117529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.