Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27870831›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2016

Asymmetric division coordinates collective cell migration in angiogenesis.

Guilherme Costa, Kyle I Harrington, Holly E Lovegrove, Donna J Page, Shilpa Chakravartula, Katie Bentley, Shane P Herbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Isolation-protocol, characterization, andFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guilherme CostaFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Kyle I HarringtonComputational Biology Laboratory, Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Holly E LovegroveFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Donna J PageFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Shilpa ChakravartulaComputational Biology Laboratory, Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Katie BentleyComputational Biology Laboratory, Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Shane P HerbertFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.

Funding

Training Program in Angiogenesis &InflammationT32HL007893 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DVORAK, HAROLD FISHER · 1998 to 2017
$5.5M
British Heart Foundation PG/16/2/31863NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007893Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The asymmetric division of stem or progenitor cells generates daughters with distinct fates and regulates cell diversity during tissue morphogenesis. However, roles for asymmetric division in other more dynamic morphogenetic processes, such as cell migration, have not previously been described. Here we combine zebrafish in vivo experimental and computational approaches to reveal that heterogeneity introduced by asymmetric division generates multicellular polarity that drives coordinated collective cell migration in angiogenesis. We find that asymmetric positioning of the mitotic spindle during endothelial tip cell division generates daughters of distinct size with discrete 'tip' or 'stalk' thresholds of pro-migratory Vegfr signalling. Consequently, post-mitotic Vegfr asymmetry drives Dll4/Notch-independent self-organization of daughters into leading tip or trailing stalk cells, and disruption of asymmetry randomizes daughter tip/stalk selection. Thus, asymmetric division seamlessly integrates cell proliferation with collective migration, and, as such, may facilitate growth of other collectively migrating tissues during development, regeneration and cancer invasion.

Indexed as

Asymmetric Cell DivisionCell MovementNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsCell PolarityCell SizeComputer SimulationEndothelial CellsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMitosisReceptors, NotchReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionTime-Lapse ImagingZebrafishenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsReceptors, NotchReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRNA, MessengerZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27870831
PMCPMC5548250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.