Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27870717›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP

An International Comparison of the Instigation and Design of Health Registers in the Epidemiological Response to Major Environmental Health Incidents.

Behrooz Behbod, Giovanni Leonardi, Yvon Motreff, Charles R Beck, Joris Yzermans, Erik Lebret, Oleg I Muravov, Tesfaye Bayleyegn, Amy Funk Wolkin, Paolo Lauriola and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Behrooz BehbodEnvironmental Change Department, Public Health England, Chilton, Oxfordshire, England (Drs Behbod and Leonardi and Mss Close and Crabbe); Santé publique France, French National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France (Ms Motreff and Dr Pirard); Field Epidemiology Services South West, Public Health England, Bristol, England (Dr Beck); Health Effects of Disasters and Environmental Incidents, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research-NIVEL, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dr Yzermans); National Institute of Public Health and the Environment-RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (Dr Lebret); Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences-IRAS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dr Lebret); Environmental Health Surveillance Branch, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Muravov); National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Drs Bayleyegn and Funk Wolkin); and Regional Reference Centre-Environment and Health, ARPA Emilia-Romagna, Modena, Italy (Dr Lauriola).
Giovanni Leonardi
Yvon Motreff
Charles R Beck
Joris Yzermans
Erik Lebret
Oleg I Muravov
Tesfaye Bayleyegn
Amy Funk Wolkin
Paolo Lauriola
Rebecca Close
Helen Crabbe
Philippe Pirard

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEpidemiological preparedness is vital in providing relevant, transparent, and timely intelligence for the management, mitigation, and prevention of public health impacts following major environmental health incidents. A register is a set of records containing systematically collected, standardized data about individual people. Planning for a register of people affected by or exposed to an incident is one of the evolving tools in the public health preparedness and response arsenal.

objectiveWe compared and contrasted the instigation and design of health registers in the epidemiological response to major environmental health incidents in England, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United States.

designConsultation with experts from the 5 nations, supplemented with a review of gray and peer-reviewed scientific literature to identify examples where registers have been used.

settingPopulations affected by or at risk from major environmental health incidents in England, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United States.

methodsNations were compared with respect to the (1) types of major incidents in their remit for considering a register; (2) arrangements for triggering a register; (3) approaches to design of register; (4) arrangements for register implementation; (5) uses of registers; and (6) examples of follow-up studies.

resultsHealth registers have played a key role in the effective public health response to major environmental incidents, including sudden chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear, as well as natural, more prolonged incidents. Value has been demonstrated in the early and rapid deployment of health registers, enabling the capture of a representative population.

conclusionThe decision to establish a health register must ideally be confirmed immediately or soon after the incident using a set of agreed criteria. The establishment of protocols for the instigation, design, and implementation of health registers is recommended as part of preparedness activities. Key stakeholders must be aware of the importance of, and protocols for, establishing a register.Agencies will find value in preparing and implementing registers as part of an effective public health response to major environmental incidents, including sudden chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear incidents, as well as natural, more prolonged incidents.

Indexed as

Civil DefenseDelivery of Health CareDisaster PlanningDisease OutbreaksEnglandFranceHumansItalyNetherlandsRegistriesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27870717
PMCPMC8365342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.