ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2017
Economic Burden of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Era of Oral Targeted Therapies in the United States.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Treatment Alternatives in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Venetoclax alone or in combination with other regimens treatment achieve deep and sustained remission of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- A pilot study of lower doses of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Blood · 2018Trial
- Transfusion dependence, use of hospice services, and quality of end-of-life care in leukemia.Blood · 2018Trial
- Rituximab plus bendamustine or chlorambucil for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: primary analysis of the randomized, open-label MABLE study.Haematologica · 2018Trial
- Safety and Management of Targeted Therapies for Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Drug safety · 2026Review
- The Market for Monoclonal Antibodies: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Article
- Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: criteria for first-line therapeutic choice-an opinion paper.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Biological Age, Aging Clocks, and the Interplay with Lymphoid Neoplasms: Mechanisms and Clinical Frontiers.Lymphatics · 2025Article
- Tubulin inhibitors: an insight into new strategies to combat leukemia.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Observational
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: 2025 Update on the Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Back from (BTKi) holiday.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Differential Cardiotoxicity of Ibrutinib Versus Chemoimmunotherapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Population-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of Epstein-Barr virus copy number in white blood cells of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with laboratory prognostic biomarker.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- The Economic Impact of Treatment Sequencing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Canada Using Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab.Cancers · 2024Article
- Real-World Health Care Resource Use and Costs Among Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated With Venetoclax-Based and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Based Regimens in the Second-Line Setting.JCO oncology practice · 2024Observational
- Cost Effectiveness of Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Oral targeted therapies represent a significant advance for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); however, their high cost has raised concerns about affordability and the economic impact on society. Our objective was to project the future prevalence and cost burden of CLL in the era of oral targeted therapies in the United States. Methods We developed a simulation model that evaluated the evolving management of CLL from 2011 to 2025: chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as the standard of care before 2014, oral targeted therapies for patients with del(17p) and relapsed CLL from 2014, and for first-line treatment from 2016 onward. A comparator scenario also was simulated where CIT remained the standard of care throughout. Disease progression and survival parameters for each therapy were based on published clinical trials. Results The number of people living with CLL in the United States is projected to increase from 128,000 in 2011 to 199,000 by 2025 (55% increase) due to improved survival; meanwhile, the annual cost of CLL management will increase from $0.74 billion to $5.13 billion (590% increase). The per-patient lifetime cost of CLL treatment will increase from $147,000 to $604,000 (310% increase) as oral targeted therapies become the first-line treatment. For patients enrolled in Medicare, the corresponding total out-of-pocket cost will increase from $9,200 to $57,000 (520% increase). Compared with the CIT scenario, oral targeted therapies resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $189,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Conclusion The increased benefit and cost of oral targeted therapies is projected to enhance CLL survivorship but can impose a substantial financial burden on both patients and payers. More sustainable pricing strategies for targeted therapies are needed to avoid financial toxicity to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.