Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27870446›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience research2017

Sex/gender influences on the nervous system: Basic steps toward clinical progress.

Claudette Elise Brooks, Janine Austin Clayton

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oestradiol as a neuromodulator of learning and memory.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. C. elegans as a model in developmental neurotoxicology.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudette Elise BrooksOffice of Research on Women's Health (ORWH), Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Janine Austin ClaytonOffice of Research on Women's Health (ORWH), Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 OD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Commentary highlighting the progress that sex-based data and research have made in neuroscience and the complexities that research has revealed thus far. Basic and preclinical neuroscientific research that considers sex as a biological variable will continue to build on the foundation of knowledge that has been started by multiple predecessors. The expansion of knowledge in preclinical neuroscience that integrates the study of both sexes will have a significant role in informing clinical trial design. We applaud the efforts of the editors and authors who have contributed to this issue. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Nervous SystemNeurosciencesSex CharacteristicsAnimalsHumansbiological variablepreclinical researchreproducibilitysex-based datawomen's health

Identifiers

PMID27870446
PMCPMC5123599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.